The "Amulet of Samarkand" audiobook is an adaptation of the popular fantasy novel written by Jonathan Stroud. It is the first book in the "Bartimaeus Sequence" series and tells the story of Nathaniel, a young magician's apprentice in an alternative London where magic is real and controlled by a powerful magician elite. The audiobook version of "The Amulet of Samarkand" is narrated by Steven Pacey, an experienced and talented voice actor who brings the characters and world of the novel to life. Pacey's narration is dynamic and engaging, capturing the nuances of each character and immersing the listener in the thrilling and dangerous world of magic. The story follows Nathaniel as he seeks revenge against Simon Lovelace, a magician who humiliated him. To achieve his goal, Nathaniel summons Bartimaeus, a powerful and cunning djinni, to help him.
Social PsyQ
To achieve his goal, Nathaniel summons Bartimaeus, a powerful and cunning djinni, to help him. The relationship between Nathaniel and Bartimaeus is one of the highlights of the audiobook, with their witty banter and conflicting agendas providing humor and tension throughout the story. The audiobook adaptation of "The Amulet of Samarkand" does justice to the original novel, capturing both its humor and darker tones.
Social psychology is everywhere. We help you make sense of it.
StandardThe Salem Witch Trials: Groupthink at its worst
In honor of Halloween and all things occult, I wanted to explore a historical event I was morbidly fascinated with as a child: the Salem Witch Trials. When I was younger, I couldn’t get my hands on enough novels and non-fiction books on the subject. I read The Crucible and watched the movie, and I was also fortunate enough to have relatives who lived in Salem, MA, so I got to visit most years around Halloween. While in Salem, I would walk through the cemeteries where the alleged witches had been laid to rest and read their tombstones. These ancient tombstones actually listed the method used to kill the accused. I remember being completely engrossed in the event the more I learned about it—I couldn’t get past the swiftness of the accusations, the unfairness of the trials, the conformity, and the upturned power hierarchy of the Salem community. I didn’t necessarily think of it in those specific terms at the time, but in retrospect, my nascent social psychological wheels were turning.
What exactly happened during the Salem Witch Trials? What perpetuated the mass hysteria? Why did it take so long to stop?
Lithograph of Salem Witch Trials, 1892, by Joseph Baker
Actually, research on groupthink suggests that what happened in Salem Village* wasn’t all that unusual; terrible, yes, but surprising? Perhaps not. A few factors combined to allow for the perfect storm of the Salem Trials.
Groupthink 1 is a way of thinking characterized by an excessive emphasis on group cohesion and solidarity. Often, group harmony is prioritized over making an accurate judgment, allowing for important information to be ignored. Groupthink is most likely to occur when the group is highly cohesive, isolated, stressed, has poor decision-making procedures, and a forceful leader. Nearly all of these factors existed in Salem Village during the winter of 1692, the time leading up to and including the witch trials.
Highly cohesive group and group isolation. The Salem villagers were Puritans, tightly knit together by their religious beliefs, including fear of the Devil’s work. Because of their religious convictions, recent attacks by Native Americans, and tension with the wealthier Salem Town, the Salem villagers were distrustful of outsiders, leaving them to rely primarily on each other for support.
Forceful leader. Reverend Samuel Parris, the first ordained minister of Salem Village, ruled strictly and was known for his greedy nature. Editorial note: he doesn’t seem like the type of person who would allow people to speak their mind.
High stress. The 1692 winter was a particularly harsh one, which strained Salem Village’s resources and increased their reliance on Salem Town. Adding to the strain was a number of displaced people from King William’s War, who landed in Salem Village, and a smallpox epidemic.
Poor decision-making. The trial process, a term I use loosely, allowed testimony about dreams and visions to be included, despite opposition from the respected minister Cotton Mather; likely, his voice just wasn’t loud enough to stop the momentum yet. Female children as young as four years old who were connected to accused older women, like Dorothy Good, daughter of Sarah Good, were questioned and thought to have confessed. These are just a few of the ways in which poor decision-making was employed.
So, the groundwork was there. And when groupthink emerged, it did so violently with all of its accompanying symptoms:
Belief in the moral correctness of the group. Need I remind you that these were deeply religious people? They prayed every day and considered themselves to be the elect. In other words, they believed they had been predestined for heaven, chosen uniquely by the God they believed in. As K. David Goss put it in Daily Life during the Salem Witch Trials, their Puritan faith was all-encompassing. These religious beliefs contributed to a lot of self-censorship and the pressure to conform, particularly among women, who were expected to aspire to the ideal virtuous woman as described in the bible (see Goss’s book for more). This pressure to conform and to limit personal beliefs likely increased significantly once accusations were being made, lest someone turn an accusation on someone who dared to speak her mind.
Considering the ripening groupthink conditions of the stressed and isolated place of Salem Village, the mass hysteria and frenzy of the Salem Witch Trials wasn’t completely unexpected, at least in hindsight. That it can be explained doesn’t detract from the horror, death, and upheaval that occurred. And community members of Salem did eventually put a stop to the madness, perhaps because the stress was unsustainable and damaged the group cohesiveness. The diminished cohesiveness may have allowed an opening for some powerful community members to feel comfortable enough to speak up. A public apology was eventually made in 1697 by Judge Sewall, who had overseen many of the trials, but it was too little, too late. Groupthink had left a permanent mark.
Groupthink can, and does, occur today, too. It can be avoided by having an impartial leader, being willing to seek outside opinions, creating subgroups to make decisions separately, and seeking anonymous opinions. 2
*The place where the witch trials occurred was actually Salem Village, present-day Danvers, and was established several miles from Salem Town, now present-day Salem. See http://salem.lib.virginia.edu/Witch.html for more information.
1,2 Janis, I.L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Examples Of Groupthink In The Salem Witch Trials
The Salem witch trials were a series of trials that took place after what is known as a witch hunt took place in the city of Salem. Several people were persecuted and executed after being accused of witchcraft. People were not the only victims. Animals were also persecuted as witches. These accusations seem absurd and preposterous, but at the time ,witchcraft was a very dangerous thing to be accused of and many paid with their lives. The question is, what made these people go along with accusations that their family members and even family pets were witches? Few people stood up against the accusations and many people made these accusations. Both conformity and fear had an effect on the results of this event. Some might even argue that groupthink …show more content…
People normally engage in groupthink because they do not want to interrupt the harmony the group has. Groupthink is caused by several things, one of the most common reasons is when group members work together for long periods of time or are similar in personality and have a powerful leader (Cherry, 2016). Sometimes those who may not agree with the decisions of the group may go along with the group anyway and remain silent. Since the people in Salem were highly religious they fit the criteria for groupthink in several ways. They all had the same core values and a strong leader. They were also extremely scared of witchcraft which was another belief most had unanimously. Reverend Samuel Parris was a very forceful leader and he was strict to the beliefs of the Puritans. He would not be a person that would be easy to disagree with. With this being said, it is relatively simple to understand why groupthink with this particular group was prominent. The village people were all very close and they had the same beliefs. This made it easy for groupthink to take …show more content…
The leader they had and took orders from was a forceful one and he was very controlling of the way things should be done in the Puritan church. Conformity may not be easily prohibited and since it is a natural thing to conform to the needs of society this would be difficult to accomplish, however, the power of groupthink is something that could be prohibited with certain steps. Some of the steps that could have been taken to prevent groupthink in the group would be, to not turn down other individuals ideas, but to give those ideas thought. Samuel Parris was not known to be understanding of the ideas of others, it was his way or no way. To make group members more comfortable in sharing ideas it is a good idea to confront others with an encouraging spirit ( Loria,2013). This helps in making group members relaxed enough to share their
The sound quality and production values are top-notch, creating an immersive listening experience for fans of the fantasy genre. Overall, "The Amulet of Samarkand" audiobook is a highly recommended adaptation of a beloved fantasy novel. With its talented narration, engaging storytelling, and rich world-building, it is sure to captivate both longtime fans of the series and newcomers alike. Whether listened to as a standalone experience or as part of the wider "Bartimaeus Sequence" series, this audiobook is a treat for fantasy lovers of all ages..
Reviews for "The Ethical Dilemmas in The Amulet of Samarkand Audiobook"
- John - 1 star
I found "The Amulet of Samarkand audiobook" to be a complete disappointment. The narrator's voice was dull and lacking any sort of enthusiasm, which made it extremely difficult to stay engaged in the story. Additionally, the sound quality was very poor, with echoes and background noise that often drowned out the dialogue. I had high hopes for this audiobook, but unfortunately, it fell short in every aspect.
- Sarah - 2 stars
I didn't particularly enjoy "The Amulet of Samarkand audiobook". The pacing was slow and the story took a while to pick up, which made it difficult for me to stay invested. The performance by the narrator was decent, but lacked the energy and character I was hoping for. Overall, it just didn't live up to my expectations and I found it to be a mediocre listening experience.
- Michael - 2 stars
I had heard great things about "The Amulet of Samarkand audiobook", but it didn't impress me as much as I had hoped. The narration was decent, but the pacing felt off, with some scenes dragging on for too long while others were rushed through. The story itself had potential, but it didn't quite deliver the depth and complexity that I was anticipating. Overall, it was an average audiobook that didn't leave a lasting impression.
- Emily - 3 stars
I had mixed feelings about "The Amulet of Samarkand audiobook". While the story had some interesting elements, the narration was lackluster and failed to bring the characters to life. The accents and voices used by the narrator were inconsistent, making it difficult to distinguish between different characters. However, the plot kept me engaged enough to finish the audiobook, even though I felt that it could have been much better with a different narrator.