Magic has always been a subject of fascination and intrigue. It is often depicted in stories and folklore as a force that can bring about extraordinary changes. The concept of magic has evolved over time, and with it, the nature of the changes it can bring has also transformed. In the past, magic was often associated with supernatural and mystical powers that could manipulate the physical world. Wizards and sorcerers were seen as beings capable of casting spells and creating magical potions to alter reality. However, as our understanding of science and technology has advanced, the idea of magic has undergone a significant shift.
However, as our understanding of science and technology has advanced, the idea of magic has undergone a significant shift. Today, magic is no longer believed to be a literal force that can change the physical world in an inexplicable way. Instead, it has become more of a metaphorical concept used to describe things that are difficult to understand or explain.
Witch Houses of the Hudson Valley
Walter R. Wheeler, known as Wally, is an architectural historian in the Hudson Valley. He works for a firm called Hartgen Archeological Associates—“Breaking Old Ground Every Day”—which is based in a restored eighteenth-century farmhouse across the river from Albany. Fifty-five years old, with a cheerful, open face and small, oval eyeglasses, Wheeler has been inside, behind, and under churches, barns, homes, and temples in cities and towns throughout New York State.
Several years ago, he began to notice a pattern. Many of his elderly colleagues—contractors, carpenters, historians—told him that, while renovating or dismantling older houses in the region, they had found strange, unsettling things hidden in the walls: dead animals, dismembered dolls, children’s shoes, broken knife blades, and also bottles filled with human hair, bent nails, or pins. Some of these objects were secreted behind old planks and floorboards. Others were concealed in nooks and voids that would have been inaccessible if not for the intrusive work of restoration—suggesting that they had been placed there deliberately, as permanent parts of the building.
Objects were only part of the pattern. There were symbols, too. Wheeler’s colleagues found them carved into woodwork, on beams, lintels, and hearths. Some of these marks, upon closer inspection, turned out to be family graffiti, or dates marking the start and end of construction. But others resembled runes, astrological diagrams, or alchemical signs. Oftentimes, the marks could be seen only by shining a light across the wood at an oblique angle, creating deeper, elongated shadows, revealing the faintest traces of lost inscriptions.
Many of the people who told Wheeler these stories were approaching retirement, or something even more permanent. “I realized it was my last, best chance to collect information from them, to make a concerted effort to contact people and locate additional examples, creating a large-enough data set to be able to see some patterns,” he recalled, when we met, earlier this fall. He began cataloguing the objects and symbols in a database, in which each individual find was associated with a street address and location inside the house. In 2017, Wheeler summarized his research in a paper titled “Magical Dwelling: Apotropaic Building Practices in the New World Dutch Cultural Hearth,” published in an edited volume on rural religious folk practices. (The homes in which these objects and inscriptions had been found tended to be quite old, dating from as early as the sixteen-hundreds, when their owners would have been culturally Dutch.) The word “apotropaic,” which derives from a Greek word meaning “to turn away,” refers to ritual practices intended to deflect malignant influences. The concealed artifacts, Wheeler had concluded, were a form of spatial magic. They were “protection strategies” meant to shield their residents from supernatural harm.
After spending the afternoon with me, showing me dozens of files, photos, and the occasional artifact, Wheeler recommended that I stop by a nearby house to see some apotropaic magic of my own. The house had been constructed in 1788. It is currently owned by a land trust; the president and secretary of the trust took me down into the basement stairwell. I clicked on my flashlight, holding it horizontally against the wooden planks, and we all bent to look closer. Alongside clearly accidental dents and scratch marks, we began to see regular geometric forms—stars and crosses carved beneath the dark paint. My companions seemed astonished. They hadn’t known that some of these symbols were there.
Last year, Wheeler travelled to Salisbury, England, to present his findings at Hidden Charms, a biannual conference on “the magical protection of buildings.” The conference took place in the Medieval Hall of Salisbury Cathedral and featured nine speakers, on subjects ranging from “construction rites” in Romania to dead animals found inside manor houses in the British Midlands. The Hidden Charms events are organized by Brian Hoggard, a British historian and musician with a particular interest in the archeology of witchcraft. In his book “Magical House Protection,” published earlier this year, Hoggard describes a scenario not unlike Wheeler’s own. “I have spoken to many archaeologists who have told me anecdotes of finding bottles, shoes and cats which did not find their way into archives or dig reports,” Hoggard writes. He suggests that, although he has documented such objects by the hundreds, many more may have been destroyed or remain undiscovered. As Hoggard later said to me, “There will be as many things as I have found, found again.”
Hoggard’s own interest in the material culture of witchcraft was sparked by a now-canonical text in the field, “The Archaeology of Ritual and Magic,” by Ralph Merrifield, a curator and archeologist primarily known for his work on Roman London. Merrifield’s book, published in 1987, approached the archeology of magic in a new way. In describing witchcraft, historians had often relied on condemnatory accounts written by judges or members of the clergy. Merrifield sought instead to explore folk magic through the material objects that the practitioners themselves had left behind. Because seventeenth-century witches were more likely to be executed than to publish memoirs or manuals, Merrifield relied on rigorous archeological field work, analyzing artifacts and sites throughout the British Isles.
Hoggard began his research two decades ago, by sending surveys to museums, archives, and other historical collections, asking if they had, in their possession, any of the key artifact types described in Merrifield’s book. These included so-called witch bottles, preserved animal corpses, and many of the other objects that Wheeler and his colleagues would later find across the Atlantic. Hoggard received a blizzard of affirmative replies. Since then, he has been developing his own hypotheses about what exactly these objects were and how they were believed to have functioned.
Central to Hoggard’s interpretation is the idea of architectural protection. He writes that concealed objects are nearly always found close to openings and portals: doors, windows, and, in particular, chimneys—a chimney, Hoggard told me, being an unnervingly open “passageway from the sky.” (Wheeler’s database shows that objects were hidden in similar places in Hudson Valley homes.) These openings presented vulnerabilities not just to burglary but to magical intrusions, such as hauntings, curses, and possessions. Addressing these “supernatural security issues,” Hoggard told me, required something stronger than locks and shutters. “When we find these objects,” he said, “we can normally tell straight away if someone was protecting the perimeter of their home by shoving things into walls and into roof spaces and marking all these entrances, or if there’s a concentration of things about the hearth. It’s pretty clear that people believed magic could come into their homes through those points and that they were trying to thwart it.”
One protective object architectural historians often uncover is the witch bottle. In the British context, the earliest witch bottles were usually curvaceous ceramic vessels—vaguely humanoid Germanic jars known as bellarmines—that had been filled with human urine and hair, along with a mix of bent iron nails and deformed pins. (Some contain fingernail clippings, as well.) The deliberately damaged ingredients, Hoggard believes, were a sign that those objects had been “killed,” allowing them to cross over to the spiritual world, where dead and evil things lurk. The logic is straightforward: break or “kill” an object in our world, and it crosses over into the next, where it is able to affect supernatural beings. Hoggard surmises that the bottles were meant to act as decoys. The spells of witches and other malevolent beings could be deflected to target a witch bottle, rather than a person, by the human elements stored within it (urine, fingernails, and hair); once the evil spirit was inside the bottle, the bent nails and pins, given new life on the other side, would wound or kill it.
The logic of substitution is common to folk magic around the world and might have been central to apotropaic magic, too. Wheeler and Hoggard have found that, in both Britain and the Hudson Valley, children’s shoes were often packed into peripheral voids around a house—the artifacts may also have been intended as targets for witches, in lieu of a home’s living residents. Such voids could also contain “curse dolls,” miniature human forms intended to stand in for the objects of spells.
Recently, however, another interpretation of these objects has been gaining ground. In April, 2019, the Museum of London Archaeology (MOLA), launched a three-year initiative, “Bottles Concealed and Revealed,” with the goal of analyzing witch bottles in collections throughout the United Kingdom. In the course of the initiative, Nigel Jeffries, MOLA’s ceramics specialist, has come to believe that witch bottles may have not only been miscategorized but misnamed: these bottles were likely medical objects, rather than magical ones. Indeed, Jeffries said, as more contemporary descriptions found in historical records and medical books have come to light, this context has become increasingly clear. Witch bottles, with their unusual mix of bodily fluids, hair clippings, and metallic substances combined, according to principles drawn from medicine, astrology, and sympathetic magic, may have been thought to act as curatives that could bring a home’s residents longevity and health.
Ceri Houlbrook, a co-organizer of the MOLA project and a lecturer in history and folklore at the University of Hertfordshire, agrees with Jeffries’s view of the bottles. In fact, she is reassessing all the artifacts discovered within the walls and voids of historic houses. “I’d argue that we can’t lump any concealed objects together,” she said. “I see shoes very differently to how I see mummified cats, for example. I don’t think we can interpret them in the same way at all.”
The Albertus Van Loon House is located about thirty-five miles south of Wheeler’s office, in the town of Athens, New York. The house has stood since 1724, its back yard sloping directly into the swollen waters of the Hudson River. When its current owners, Randall Evans and Carrie Feder, bought it, in 1997, it was uninhabitable. Its walls and ceilings were unstable, and entire rooms had been dismantled, their boards and beams stacked in no discernible order. As soon as the couple started their reconstruction of the house, which is still ongoing, they began finding concealed objects and other artifacts—a dozen, then another, then another.
For Evans and Feder, the Van Loon House is something of a final project. The couple are retired home designers and restorers; Feder is also an artist and curator. Earlier this month, when I visited them and stepped into the house, I felt as if I were passing through a portal. The clear blue autumn sky was occluded by low ceilings and heavy beams; in places, early evening sunlight shone between the unplastered laths of the home’s interior walls, travelling from one room to the next. The couple seemed intrigued, even faintly amused, by my interest in their house. They hadn’t yet read Wheeler’s paper, but they had arrived at their own interpretation of the objects they’d found inside their home. These included a rust-encrusted revolver, children’s shoes, pieces of quartz, a device that appeared to be an impression mold for counterfeiting coins, and the eyeless face of a decapitated doll. Nearly all of the objects were on display inside a glass cabinet near the fireplace. “It really is amazing how much stuff you find in the walls of a house like this,” Feder, who tends to listen with a still, skeptical expression, said. “We kind of live in it as an archeological site.”
We entered a small study behind a guest bedroom. Evans, slender and with a slight goatee, pushed on a panel in the wall. It swung open, revealing a hidden staircase leading up to what he called “the puzzle room.” The couple had pieced the space back together, board by board, until a small sleeping quarters emerged.
Through examination of family life, architecture and furniture of the seventeenth century, visitors gain a deeper comprehension of the people involved in the Witch Trials and an enriched
understanding of America's colonial heritage.
In this sense, the changes brought about by "magic" are not supernatural in nature, but rather the result of human ingenuity and innovation. For example, advancements in technology have made once unimaginable changes possible. The advent of the internet and smartphones has transformed the way we communicate and access information, effectively creating a new reality for many people. These changes can be seen as "magical" because they have the power to completely alter our daily lives. Furthermore, magic can also be seen in the realm of science itself. Scientific discoveries and breakthroughs often lead to changes in our understanding of the world and our place in it. Concepts that were once considered impossible or magical, such as space travel or genetic engineering, are now within the realm of possibility due to scientific advancements. These changes, while not magical in the traditional sense, are the result of human curiosity and innovation. In conclusion, the idea of magic and the changes it can bring about have evolved over time. While magic was once believed to be a supernatural force capable of altering the physical world, it has now become more of a metaphorical concept used to describe extraordinary and difficult-to-explain changes. Whether it be through advancements in technology or scientific discoveries, humanity has the ability to bring about magical changes that can shape the course of our future..
Reviews for "Through the Looking Glass: How Magic Changes Our Perception of the World"
- Jane - 1/5 rating - I did not like "Tgose magic chsnges gteasd" at all. The story felt disjointed and confusing, with characters that were undeveloped and lacked depth. The writing style was also frustratingly irregular, with inconsistent grammar and sentence structure. I found it difficult to stay engaged and ended up putting the book down several times before finally forcing myself to finish it. Overall, I was extremely disappointed and would not recommend this book to anyone.
- Mike - 2/5 rating - "Tgose magic chsnges gteasd" had an interesting premise, but unfortunately, it failed to deliver. The pacing was slow, and the plot lacked tension and excitement. I found myself struggling to connect with the characters, who seemed bland and unremarkable. Additionally, the writing quality was subpar, filled with awkward dialogue and clichéd descriptions. While there were a few intriguing moments, overall, I was underwhelmed by this book and would not read it again.
- Sarah - 2/5 rating - I had high hopes for "Tgose magic chsnges gteasd," but it fell flat for me. The world-building was sloppy, leaving many unanswered questions and inconsistencies. The main characters lacked complexity and felt more like caricatures than real people. The romantic subplot was predictable and lacked chemistry, making it difficult to invest in the relationship. The writing style was also clunky and awkward, detracting from the overall reading experience. Overall, this book did not meet my expectations and left me feeling unsatisfied.