Magic in close proximity refers to the phenomenon where the presence of magic in a particular area or environment enhances its effects and intensifies its powers. When magic is concentrated in close proximity, its potency multiplies, resulting in stronger and more profound manifestations. In a world where magic exists, certain places become known for their enchanting properties. These locations are often referred to as magical hotspots, where the mystical energy is dense and palpable. The concentration of magical energy in these spots is believed to be the result of various factors, such as ley lines, ancient rituals, or the convergence of powerful magical entities. One of the core principles behind magic in close proximity is the idea that magic is contagious.
One could think of this in terms of musical ability. Master musicians with enough practice can meet at random and rely on their knowledge of theory and their skill to complement one another, in a way sticking to basic principles and in a way taking each others cues to perform a piece successfully. Similarly a group of new musicians can practice together to learn themselves as well as discover each other's abilities, strengths and weaknesses. The binding is a trick that simply bypasses this required period of group practice and makes those differences immediately apparent to all in the group.
The binding is a trick that simply bypasses this required period of group practice and makes those differences immediately apparent to all in the group. However, outside that, the Paladin s primary focus is on buffing his own melee attacks with the X -ing Smite spells, which isn t exactly what you re after.
One of the core principles behind magic in close proximity is the idea that magic is contagious. When one spellcaster channels their magical energy into a particular area, it creates a ripple effect, attracting and amplifying other magical forces. This creates a feedback loop, with each spellcaster benefitting from the increased magical potential surrounding them.
Close-quarters spellcaster – Not a gish
I’m looking to make a character whose focus is on the use of spellcasting in close quarters. This might take the form of damage waves that are centered on his location, auras that buff nearby allies, melee-range attack spells, or the creation of terrain hazards in his immediate vicinity, but it is not my goal to have or use significant weapon skills. Of these options, I like battlefield control best, and direct-damage blasting least, but most significantly I just want a mage who has good reason to get into close quarters, without being a fighter-mage hybrid. For the purposes of this question, I’m defining “close quarters” as within 30 ft. of enemy combatants, i.e. close enough that a typical opponent can in one turn move up to me and attack me in melee. For example, I’m considering a dwarf wizard, picking up the Heavily Armored and Shield Master feats, and not using a weapon so that I can cast spells without War Caster (though the advantage on Constitution saving throws made to avoid losing concentration on a spell may make the feat too valuable to miss out on even if I don’t necessarily care to have a weapon). Is this wizard my best bet? Which school is most appropriate – in a quick scan of the benefits, abjurer seemed to be choice, though transmuter definitely seemed to putting in some solid food for thought. The evoker’s ability to sculpt spells also seems very valuable, particularly if there are good close-range evocations to use (I would prefer battlefield control, buffing, or debuffing over direct damage, however). Alternatively, in previous editions, both cleric and druid (especially 4e’s druid) would have arguably been better picks for this, but in those editions and 5e (as far as I can tell) those classes do tend to focus a lot on their melee physical attacks – to what degree can I ignore those without ignoring significant aspects of my class package? Or are there, perhaps, archetypes for classes more typically comfortable in melee that would give me good reason to use spellcasting even when enemies are around, rather than simply magically enhancing my weapon-fighting skills? I’m not staunchly opposed to having weapon skills, I just don’t plan on using them, ideally.
Follow KRyan asked Dec 31, 2014 at 2:41 KRyan KRyan 344k 58 58 gold badges 888 888 silver badges 1418 1418 bronze badges \$\endgroup\$\$\begingroup\$ @TheDarkeLorde Please don’t answer in comments—answers go in Answers. Comments are solely for clarifying or improving the question, and after that purpose has been achieved, they get deleted. Since your comment doesn’t try to clarify the question, it’s not serving that purpose and is subject to immediate deletion. And in this case, in particular, your answer is a rather good one, so it really needs to be in a proper Answer so I can upvote it. \$\endgroup\$
Mar 15, 2021 at 18:16\$\begingroup\$ As a note, I would suggest War Caster so you can cast spells as reactions, too, even if you don't want the weapon-based component of the feat. Two out of three is still pretty useful, and becomes three out of three if you use a staff as a focus (magic staves can be used as magic weapons, and non-magic focus staves are essentially just really good quarterstaffs, so it may benefit you to have the option even if you never plan to use it). \$\endgroup\$
Jul 28, 2021 at 19:05The effects of magic in close proximity can vary greatly depending on the nature of the magic being utilized. For example, in a battle between spellcasters, the presence of magic in close proximity can lead to heightened spells, increased spellcasting speed, and amplified magical defenses. It can also create an atmosphere of heightened tension and anticipation, as the power of magic becomes more tangible and visible. However, the consequences of magic in close proximity are not always positive. While it can amplify benevolent magic, it can also magnify malevolent and destructive forces. This can lead to catastrophic consequences if not controlled or neutralized effectively. The intense energy generated by magic in close proximity can become unstable, creating chaos and destruction, especially when used irresponsibly or without proper control. Scholars and practitioners of magic often study and seek out areas of close proximity due to the unique opportunities they provide. These hotspots are ideal for conducting rituals, harnessing greater magical energy, and exploring the limits of their abilities. The study of magic in close proximity is a constantly evolving field, as spellcasters attempt to understand and manipulate these concentrated sources of power. In conclusion, magic in close proximity is a phenomenon where the concentration of magical energy in a particular area magnifies its effects and intensifies its powers. It can lead to stronger spells, increased spellcasting abilities, and a heightened atmosphere of magic. However, it is essential to approach magic in close proximity with caution and responsibility, as its unchecked power can lead to catastrophic consequences. Understanding and harnessing this unique phenomenon can offer spellcasters unparalleled opportunities for exploration and advancement in the world of magic..
Reviews for "Close-Up Magic: From Street Performances to Broadway Shows"
1. Sarah - 2 stars - I was really looking forward to reading "Magic in Close Proximity" as I love books about magic and fantasy. However, I found this book to be quite disappointing. The plot was confusing and lacked direction, and the characters were one-dimensional. Additionally, the pacing was incredibly slow, making it difficult for me to stay engaged in the story. Overall, I felt let down by this book and wouldn't recommend it to others.
2. John - 1 star - "Magic in Close Proximity" is one of the worst books I have ever read. The writing style was dull and uninteresting, and the dialogue felt forced and unnatural. I couldn't connect with any of the characters, and the book failed to evoke any emotion from me. The magic system in the story was poorly explained and inconsistent, leaving me confused throughout the entire read. I regret wasting my time on this book and would advise others to avoid it.
3. Emily - 2 stars - I had high hopes for "Magic in Close Proximity" after hearing positive reviews, but unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations. The world-building felt lacking, and I struggled to visualize the setting and understand the different magical elements. The pacing was inconsistent, with some chapters dragging on while others rushed through important events. The romance in the story also felt forced and lacked depth. Overall, I found this book to be mediocre at best, and I wouldn't recommend it to fellow readers.
4. Michael - 1 star - "Magic in Close Proximity" was a complete waste of my time. The writing was subpar, filled with cliches and predictable plot twists. The characters lacked depth and were forgettable, making it impossible for me to invest in their journey. The book also suffered from poor editing, with numerous grammatical errors and typos. I struggled to finish this book and was left feeling unsatisfied. I strongly advise against picking up this disappointing read.