The Curse of Cassandra, also known as the Cassandra Complex, is a metaphorical term derived from Greek mythology. Cassandra was a princess of Troy who was granted the gift of prophecy but was cursed so that no one would believe her prophecies. The term now refers to a situation where someone's valid warnings or predictions are ignored or dismissed. In modern usage, the Curse of Cassandra is often applied to situations in which individuals or groups that have knowledge or expertise in a particular area are ignored or discredited. This can occur in various contexts, such as politics, business, or science. It is often rooted in a combination of disbelief, ignorance, or arrogance.
So far, this sounds pretty in line with the books. The first book of the Mayfair Witches saga was the 1990’s The Witching Hour. The novel focused on a neurosurgeon named Rowan Mayfair, who discovers she is the latest designee in a family of powerful New Orleans witches. These witches commune and often control a powerful spirit named Lasher.
She can be playful as a vagabond who lives on a boat and lives a free sexual life, but we re also meant to appreciate her integrity, which could be jeopardized by Lasher. But amid that sordid lore, creators Michelle Ashford Masters of Sex and Esta Spalding On Becoming a God in Central Florida make the fatal mistake of prioritizing mythology and mystery over personality and plot.
It is often rooted in a combination of disbelief, ignorance, or arrogance. The Curse of Cassandra can be particularly detrimental when it comes to addressing societal problems or averting disasters. It can hinder progress, as valid concerns or warnings are disregarded until it is too late.
‘Mayfair Witches’ Review: Alexandra Daddario in AMC’s Exasperating Anne Rice Adaptation
The supernatural drama revolves around a doctor who learns that she descends from a long lineage of magic-wielding women haunted by a malevolent entity (Jack Huston).
Angie Han
Plus Icon ajhan January 5, 2023 6:45am- Share this article on Facebook
- Share this article on Twitter
- Share this article on Flipboard
- Share this article on Email
- Show additional share options
- Share this article on Linkedin
- Share this article on Pinit
- Share this article on Reddit
- Share this article on Tumblr
- Share this article on Whatsapp
- Share this article on Print
- Share this article on Comment
- Share this article on Facebook
- Share this article on Twitter
- Share this article on Flipboard
- Share this article on Email
- Show additional share options
- Share this article on Linkedin
- Share this article on Pinit
- Share this article on Reddit
- Share this article on Tumblr
- Share this article on Whatsapp
- Share this article on Print
- Share this article on Comment
On first impression, AMC’s Mayfair Witches appears as lush as the overgrown yard of the New Orleans bungalow where much of it takes place.
The plot, adapted from Anne Rice‘s novels, centers on a preternaturally gifted surgeon named Rowan (The White Lotus‘ Alexandra Daddario) who discovers she’s heir to a dynasty of women with special powers. As she explores her family tree, each gnarled root seems to branch off into knottier tangles still — ultimately yielding a saga laden with sex, death and magic, spanning hundreds of years and thousands of miles.
Related Stories
AMC Networks U.S. Ad Revenue Drops 20 Percent, Streaming Subs Fall to 11.5M
Ryan Gosling Unveils Action-Comedy Short Film to Celebrate Tag Heuer Carrera's 60th in London
Mayfair Witches
The Bottom Line Undermined by its emphasis on lore over character.Airdate: 9 p.m. Sunday, Jan. 8 (AMC)
Cast: Alexandra Daddario, Jack Huston, Tongayi Chirisa, Harry Hamlin
Creators: Esta Spalding, Michelle Ashford
But amid that sordid lore, creators Michelle Ashford (Masters of Sex) and Esta Spalding (On Becoming a God in Central Florida) make the fatal mistake of prioritizing mythology and mystery over personality and plot. As a result, while there’s a great deal happening onscreen at every turn — secrets to uncover, murders to solve, dances to be had — we’re offered little reason to get very invested in any of it.
In fairness, some of that murkiness is purposeful. As the season begins, Rowan Fielding has no inkling of her true heritage, let alone the dark legacy attached to it. Once she does make her way to the Mayfairs, she finds a clan who’ve purposely kept their affairs in the shadows. Though they’re superficially welcoming, no member of the family seems to be without ulterior motives — not Cortland (Harry Hamlin) the bon vivant uncle, not uptight Aunt Carlotta (Beth Grant) and probably not her perky cousins Josephine (Jen Richards) and Tessa (Madison Wolfe) either.
Woven into the present-day narrative of Rowan’s hunt for answers are flashbacks to a 17th-century Scottish village, chronicling an earlier generation of Mayfairs whose gift for midwivery attracts dangerous suspicion from religious authorities. And sprinkled throughout the dialogue are allusions to other Mayfairs still, whose biographies seem to bolster the warning imparted to Rowan during her quest: “Things don’t end well for the women in this family.” Such hints, combined with a pretty visual palette of dark jewel tones, are enough to string a viewer along for a while, in hopes of a juicy payoff somewhere down the line.
There’s a point at which an alluring enigma begins to look like frustrating opacity, however, and Mayfair Witches crosses it sometime around halfway through its eight-episode season. As of its fifth hour-long installment (the last one sent to critics), the series is still treading the waters of exposition. It’s forever introducing new characters and concepts without explaining the ones it’s already established, or throwing out new plot twists without settling on any distinctive perspective or tone. The vivid personalities, overheated grandeur and wry humor of last year’s well-received Interview With the Vampire, also based on source material from Rice, are much missed.
Even Rowan remains a puzzle, and not by design. We’re given a handful of details about who she’s meant to be: a doctor who cares earnestly about healing others, a wanderer who lives on a houseboat, an adoptee aching to connect with her birth family. But the narrative renders her almost entirely reactive — an innocent reeling from shock or a pawn to be manipulated by others, rather than a heroine allowed to make choices of her own volition — and Daddario struggles to pull together this jumble of traits into a coherent personality.
Far more memorable, though used much more sparingly, is Lasher, a shapeshifting entity who’s been bound to the family for generations. Jack Huston is well cast as the being’s most common form, a graceful man with a cryptic smile and a smoky voice, and he’s able to conjure sparks with nearly everyone he encounters. He becomes the most potent manifestation of the desire coursing underneath so much of Mayfair Witches‘ story, his powers casting illusions that tap into the truest wants of his victims. Those dreams are often (though not always) romantic in nature, and much of the series’ most evocative scenes are sexual fantasies shot in a fevered haze, as if its participants’ senses have overcome their reason.
But if Mayfair Witches is tapped into its characters’ longing, it’s far less legible about what exactly they want and why. One subplot has commitment-phobe Rowan striking up a romance with Ciprien (Tongayi Chirisa), who’s been assigned by some arcane organization to protect her. Yet both halves of the relationship are so thinly written that it’s unclear whether we’re meant to be rooting for a rare and genuine love, or fretting that they’ve fallen under some kind of otherworldly influence. Oddest of all, there’s little sense of what’s at stake in any of these arcs — not even Lasher’s, though evidently his goals are vile enough that some of the Mayfairs will stoop to unthinkable acts to stop him.
Nowhere is the series’ vagueness more noticeable than in the otherwise intriguing fifth episode, in which Lasher tries his best to appeal to a trapped Rowan. “You want pleasure. Sovereignty. You want to be adored. You want cake,” he practically purrs. Not only is his analysis strangely generic (don’t most people want pleasure, adoration and cake?); it struck me that I had no idea if he was actually right about Rowan. Even after hours spent with her, I couldn’t have told you what she wanted beyond more information about her past.
Early in her journey, Rowan sighs, “I really miss the world making sense” — only for Ciprien to point out that it never did, she simply didn’t realize it didn’t. The moment comes just after Rowan’s started to realize how strange her family history truly is but before she’s begun to grasp what any of it means for her. Presumably, she’ll get a grip on this new “world behind the world” eventually, and find a way to bend it to her own will or be crushed by it in the process.
For those of us existing outside the Mayfair universe, though, the calculation is different. Absent characters worth loving or a plot clear enough to follow, what we’re left with is faint exasperation at a world that, for all its superficial and fleeting charms, seems to make no sense at all.
For those of us existing outside the Mayfair universe, though, the calculation is different. Absent characters worth loving or a plot clear enough to follow, what we’re left with is faint exasperation at a world that, for all its superficial and fleeting charms, seems to make no sense at all.
This can have severe consequences, especially when dealing with issues related to public safety, health, or the environment. There are several factors that contribute to the Curse of Cassandra. One common reason is cognitive dissonance, where people reject information that conflicts with their existing beliefs or desires. In some cases, those in positions of power may have a vested interest in suppressing certain information or maintaining the status quo. Another factor is the reliance on consensus or conformity. People often tend to follow the majority opinion or go along with the prevailing narrative, even if it may not be based on sound evidence or reasoning. This can create a culture of groupthink, where dissenting views are discouraged or dismissed. The media and public opinion also play a significant role in perpetuating the Curse of Cassandra. Sensationalism and headline-grabbing news often take precedence over well-reasoned analysis or in-depth reporting. This can lead to the marginalization or distortion of critical voices, further perpetuating the ignorance or disbelief. To overcome the Curse of Cassandra, it is important to foster a culture that values expertise, critical thinking, and open dialogue. It requires a willingness to listen to and consider different perspectives, even if they challenge established beliefs. This also involves holding those in power accountable and demanding transparency and honesty. In conclusion, the Curse of Cassandra refers to situations where valid warnings or predictions are ignored or dismissed. This phenomenon can have serious consequences and hinder progress. Overcoming the Curse of Cassandra requires a shift in mindset and a commitment to seeking and valuing expertise and critical thinking. It is essential for addressing societal problems and averting disasters..
Reviews for "Cassandra's Curse: The Danger of Ignoring Women's Voices"
1. John - 2 out of 5 stars - I was really disappointed with "Curse of Cassandra." The plot was incredibly predictable, and the characters felt one-dimensional. There was no depth or development to any of them, and I found it hard to care about what happened to them. The pacing was all over the place, with slow and boring moments followed by rushed and confusing scenes. Overall, it felt like a missed opportunity for a great supernatural thriller.
2. Sarah - 1 out of 5 stars - I couldn't even finish watching "Curse of Cassandra." The acting was subpar, with wooden performances from the entire cast. The dialogue felt forced and unnatural, making it impossible to connect with the characters or the story. The special effects were laughably bad, and the overall production quality was below par. I wouldn't recommend wasting your time on this film.
3. Mark - 2.5 out of 5 stars - "Curse of Cassandra" had a promising concept, but it failed to deliver. The story had potential, but it was poorly executed. The script was weak, filled with clichés and uninspired dialogue. The pacing was off, with too much time spent on unnecessary scenes and not enough on building tension. The ending was unsatisfying and left too many loose ends. Overall, I found the movie to be underwhelming and forgettable.
4. Emily - 2 out of 5 stars - I was expecting a scary and thrilling experience from "Curse of Cassandra," but it fell flat. The scares were predictable and lacked originality. The jump scares were cheap and overused, losing their effectiveness early on. The characters made questionable decisions that were frustrating to watch. The lack of character development made it hard to care about their fates. The overall result was a forgettable and mediocre horror film.
5. Michael - 1.5 out of 5 stars - "Curse of Cassandra" was a mess of a movie. The plot was convoluted and confusing, making it hard to follow. The editing was choppy and gave the film a disjointed feel. The acting was mediocre at best, with no standout performances. The scares were few and far between, and when they did happen, they were underwhelming. I wouldn't recommend wasting your time on this film unless you have a lot of patience and low expectations.