artful dodgwr

The Queen Mary curse is a mysterious phenomenon associated with the British ocean liner, the RMS Queen Mary. The ship, which was famously known for its luxury and elegance, has a dark and haunting history. Before it was converted into a hotel and tourist attraction, the Queen Mary operated as a transatlantic liner from 1936 to 1967. During World War II, it was used as a troopship and played a significant role in transporting soldiers to different regions. However, it is believed that the ship's involvement in wartime activities has contributed to the curse that some associate with it. Numerous legends and stories surround the Queen Mary curse.

And so, too, unceasing devotion may be admirable (though it may be annoying), but it is certainly truly unceasing – as the affixes indicate, is doesn’t cease; it’s continuous. Incessant devotion, on the other hand, is much more likely to be annoying, and has the option of something that happens with great frequency (though that would be more likely with a plural: incessant devotions). It’s a little more removed from the clear literalness of cease because of its lesser resemblance.

Words are known by the company they keep, and have a look at the kinds of words each one is likely to travel with unceasing shows up with such as struggle, flow, activity, rain, wind, and demands ; on the other hand, incessant shows up with demands, noise, rain, activity, wind Whaddya mean they look the same. The Magic Way is an in-depth study of how any magic effect may be improved until its method becomes so impervious to discovery that audiences simply relax happily into the experience of the impossible.

Numerous legends and stories surround the Queen Mary curse. One of the most famous is the tale of a sailor who was accidentally crushed to death by a door in the engine room during a routine drill. Supposedly, his spirit still lingers on the ship and has been witnessed by many guests and crew members.

incessant & unceasing

Well, I’d say that depends at least in part on how you feel about the devotion: is it commendable or annoying? It also depends to some extent on whether the devotion is continuous or continual. The two words are supposedly synonymous, but we shall see that they do have differences in flavour and usage patterns.

Incessant and unceasing are like long-lost twins separated at birth. Only they’re not quite identical anymore – they’re sort of like Danny DeVito and Arnold Schwarzenegger in Twins. Well, not quite, but they have elaborated differently from the same root. Both come from the Latin verb cessare “cease, stop”, which is in turn derived from cedere “yield, cede”. Both came to English by way of French. But in the case of unceasing, just the verb root was borrowed over and Anglicized as cease in the 14th century, and English affixes were added to make unceasing (also dating from the 14th century). In the case of incessant, the whole French word was borrowed over (with a change in pronunciation) – about 200 years later than cease showed up.

We can note the different sounds and feels of the two words: although both have a scissor-like quality, unceasing starts with the dull, mid-central “uh” vowel and has a “long” vowel peak (written with that more open-feeling ea), while incessant is higher and tighter from start to finish: in is more acute and perhaps pushier than un, the stressed vowel [ε] is a bit lower than the [i:] in unceasing but tighter because shorter, and the following [s] may be thought of as longer (without actually being so) because it’s written doubled. As for echoes, unceasing has sounds of sea, sing, and seizing, while incessant is more likely to bring to mind such words as incense and necessity and perhaps insensitive.

Have those factors helped shape the current shades of meaning and usage of the two words? I can’t say. Actually, it would take a lot of work to come up with even a suggestion of an answer. But we can see what has shaped up. Words are known by the company they keep, and have a look at the kinds of words each one is likely to travel with: unceasing shows up with such as struggle, flow, activity, rain, wind, and demands; on the other hand, incessant shows up with demands, noise, rain, activity, wind… Whaddya mean they look the same?

Actually, while there are overlaps, the emphasis is indeed a little different. Something that is unceasing is typically continuous (like flow), and may be positively, negatively, or neutrally toned (it can be applied to kindness, as by Walter Scott, or a progression, as by Willa Cather, or care or change or toil, as by William Wordsworth). Something that is incessant may be continuous or may be iterative (repeating), and is usually at least slightly negatively toned (like noise; it can be applied to shocks or war, as by Wordsworth, or slashing, as by Sherwood Anderson, or weepings, as by Shakespeare, or pain, as by Christopher Marlowe, or uneasiness, as by H.G. Wells).

Consider, for instance, incessant visits versus unceasing visits. Neither is likely to be very positively toned, though unceasing visits could be; but also, incessant visits means the person is visiting, for instance, every day, without cease, while unceasing visits may mean that or may mean that the visits are of great duration, or both.

And so, too, unceasing devotion may be admirable (though it may be annoying), but it is certainly truly unceasing – as the affixes indicate, is doesn’t cease; it’s continuous. Incessant devotion, on the other hand, is much more likely to be annoying, and has the option of something that happens with great frequency (though that would be more likely with a plural: incessant devotions). It’s a little more removed from the clear literalness of cease because of its lesser resemblance.

For what it’s worth, incessant is also the more common of the two words; if Google Ngrams are to be trusted, it shows up about two and a half times as often as unceasing, and has done so pretty consistently for at least two centuries – although both words had a peak in the mid-1800s and have been subsiding ever since. But, yes, their use has not ceased – which is not to say it is incessant (which implies a very notable frequency).

At a guess, you probably want unceasing devotion – it’s the safer choice in that case anyway (but you can see that you may do better with incessant in some contexts). But there are many other cases where incessant would be the better choice.

Another popular legend tells the story of a young girl who tragically drowned in the ship's pool. Witnesses claim to have heard the sounds of splashing water and laughter, even though the pool has been empty for years. Some visitors have even reported seeing a wet footprints leading away from the pool. There have also been reports of ghostly figures and strange occurrences in various parts of the ship, including disembodied voices, unexplained footsteps, and doors slamming shut on their own. Many guests and paranormal investigators have reported feeling sudden drops in temperature and experiencing feelings of being watched in certain areas of the ship. Despite the ship's paranormal reputation and the legends surrounding it, the Queen Mary has become a popular tourist destination. Visitors can take guided ghost tours and spend the night on the ship to experience its eerie atmosphere firsthand. The ship's haunted reputation has also inspired several movies and TV shows, further perpetuating its association with the Queen Mary curse. Whether the Queen Mary curse is a result of the ship's historical tragedies and wartime activities or simply a product of folklore and imagination, it remains a captivating and eerie part of the ship's history. The stories and legends surrounding the Queen Mary continue to intrigue and fascinate visitors from around the world, making it one of the most famous haunted locations in the United States..

Reviews for "artful dodgwr"

artful dodgwr