WOTFH, which stands for 'Work on the Fringe of Home', is a concept that has gained traction in recent years, especially in the realm of male professionals. Traditionally, the image of a professional working from home has often been associated with women, but times are changing. Men too are increasingly opting for flexible work arrangements that allow them to strike a balance between their personal and professional lives. One of the key advantages of WOTFH for men is the ability to spend more quality time with their families. By eliminating the need for a daily commute and reducing time spent on mundane tasks associated with an office environment, men can allocate more hours to their loved ones. This can lead to healthier relationships, better communication, and an overall improved family dynamic.
Copyright © 2023 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.
David Paton, one of the members of Pilot, wrote the song s lyrics and came up with the melody while recovering in the hospital after getting his tonsils removed. Formed in 1973 by bassist vocalist David Paton and keyboardist vocalist Billy Lyall both of whom had been substitute members whatever that is of the Bay City Rollers they were joined by drummer Stuart Tosh, who also sang.
This can lead to healthier relationships, better communication, and an overall improved family dynamic. In addition, WOTFH provides men with the opportunity to be more involved in domestic responsibilities. By being physically present in the home environment, men can actively contribute to household chores, childcare, and other essential tasks.
Pilot’s ‘Magic’ Trick: Never Believe It’s Not So
It’s one of those songs that you might not hear for years, but then when you do, it’s as if you’d heard it just yesterday. “Magic” has levels of familiarity embedded into its signature melody and its engaging, uplifting vocal. Within a few seconds—if you’re old enough—your mind will place it smack dab in the mid-’70s, when the song scooted up the U.S. Billboard singles chart to #5.
If you’re the sing-along type, you won’t have to tax your brain very hard. Its chorus will come back to you instantly: “Oh-ho-ho, it’s magic, you know, never believe it’s not so,” they sing, and why would you? They’re very convincing.
The couple of verses are simple too: a few lines about loving to sleep in and listen to the “crazy music playing in the morning light” and loving a sunny day. and that’s all there is to it. That. and a very catchy guitar riff. Even if you’re too young to remember when it ruled the radio, it’s pretty difficult to resist.
But who exactly are these good-timing optimists? You draw a blank. Could it be early ELO? You go to YouTube and type “ELO magic” into the search bar. Nope, only “Strange Magic.” Wasn’t them.
Pilot in a 1975 publicity photo
Now your curiosity is piqued. You bring up Google, input “magic” and the search engine returns more than three billion possible solutions. Hmm, we’re gonna need to narrow this down a bit. How about “magic song 1970s”?
Well, what do ya know? It’s the first result. Turns out it was a band called Pilot . And that leads you down another rabbit hole, because unlike, say, ELO, you can’t think of another song by Pilot and have no clue who they were or where they’re from or what became of them. Inquiring rock fan minds want to know.
Turns out they were Scottish, from Edinburgh to be precise. Formed in 1973 by bassist/vocalist David Paton and keyboardist/vocalist Billy Lyall—both of whom had been “substitute members” (whatever that is) of the Bay City Rollers—they were joined by drummer Stuart Tosh, who also sang. Additional non-member personnel, most notably guitarist Ian Bairnson, filled out the sound.
They cut their debut, Alan Parsons-produced album, cleverly titled From the Album of the Same Name, in 1974 (in the U.S. it was just named Pilot, because we’re no fun), and released “Magic,” credited to Paton and Lyall. It rose to #11 in the U.K. but did even better in the States where it reached #5 on July 12, 1975.
And so Pilot was off, ready to conquer the world! Except, they didn’t. A track called “Just a Smile” went absolutely nowhere, anywhere, and although their single “January” actually topped the British chart, and the Australian chart, the Pilot light didn’t spark a second time in the U.S.—“January” flamed out at #78.
There would be other efforts, and a handful of albums that never got off the ground (Pilot error?) but by 1978 the band members had landed in other places. Tosh and Paton joined the Alan Parsons Project (Tosh also worked with 10cc), and Paton appears to still be active today. Lyall died in 1989.
But for all intents and purposes, Pilot joined the ranks of the wonderful one-hit wonders in 1974, with their ever-alluring “Magic,” and that’s not a bad trick at all.
Best Classic Bands Editor Jeff Tamarkin has been a prolific music journalist for more than four decades. He is formerly the editor of Goldmine, CMJ and Relix magazines, has written for dozens of other publications and has authored liner notes for more than 80 CDs. Jeff has also served on the Nominating Committee of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and as a consultant to the Grammys. His first book was 'Got a Revolution! The Turbulent Flight of Jefferson Airplane.' He is also the co-author of 'Shell Shocked: My Life with the Turtles, Flo and Eddie, and Frank Zappa, etc.,' with Howard Kaylan.
Latest posts by Jeff Tamarkin (see all)- 1967: The Year in 50 Classic Rock Albums - 10/17/2023
- Barry McGuire vs. Barry Sadler: When the News Hit #1 - 10/15/2023
- When the Chambers Brothers’ ‘Time’ Had Come - 10/13/2023
The couple of verses are simple too: a few lines about loving to sleep in and listen to the “crazy music playing in the morning light” and loving a sunny day. and that’s all there is to it. That. and a very catchy guitar riff. Even if you’re too young to remember when it ruled the radio, it’s pretty difficult to resist.
This not only helps to alleviate the burden on their partners but also allows men to develop a deeper understanding and appreciation of the efforts required to maintain a household. Furthermore, WOTFH can lead to increased productivity for male professionals. Working away from office distractions and with the ability to tailor their work environment to their liking, men often find themselves more focused and motivated. This enhanced productivity can result in notable career growth and advancements. However, it is important to note that WOTFH for men does come with its set of challenges. One such challenge is the need to establish clear boundaries between work and personal life. Without a physical separation between the two spheres, it can be difficult for men to switch off from work mode and fully engage in family or personal activities. Additionally, the lack of social interaction that is often experienced when working from home can have an impact on one's mental well-being if not actively managed. In conclusion, WOTFH offers numerous benefits for men. The ability to prioritize family, contribute to domestic responsibilities, and increase productivity are just a few of them. However, it is crucial for men to be mindful of the challenges that may arise and implement strategies to navigate them effectively. With the right approach, WOTFH can prove to be a positive and rewarding experience for male professionals..
Reviews for "Boosting productivity as a male remote worker"
1. John - 2 stars - I was really disappointed with "Wotfh for male". The book seemed to perpetuate outdated gender stereotypes and reinforce toxic masculinity. There was very little nuance or depth in addressing the challenges faced by men today, and it failed to provide any actionable solutions. Overall, I found the content to be shallow and unhelpful.
2. Sarah - 1 star - I found "Wotfh for male" to be incredibly sexist and offensive. The author seemed to have a limited understanding of gender issues and portrayed men as victims without acknowledging the privileges they often enjoy. The book completely disregarded the experiences of marginalized groups and failed to offer a balanced perspective. I would not recommend this book to anyone interested in understanding the complexities of gender dynamics.
3. Michael - 2 stars - "Wotfh for male" missed the mark for me. It seemed to focus solely on traditional masculine traits and ignored the diversity within male experiences. The advice provided was generic and often relied on outdated stereotypes. I was hoping for a more nuanced exploration of masculinity, but instead, I found a shallow portrayal of what it means to be a man. Overall, I was disappointed with the lack of depth in this book.
4. Emma - 1 star - I found "Wotfh for male" to be regressive and harmful. The author seemed to suggest that men are inherently superior to women, which is not only untrue but also perpetuates inequality. The book completely ignored the struggles faced by women in society and failed to acknowledge the role of patriarchy in shaping gender dynamics. I was deeply disappointed with the lack of intersectionality and would not recommend this book to anyone looking for a balanced perspective on gender issues.