Magic in the Water Trailer The trailer for the movie "Magic in the Water" begins with a serene shot of a peaceful lake surrounded by lush green trees and mountains. The camera slowly zooms in, drawing the viewers' attention to an enchanting blue hue glowing beneath the surface of the water. Soft and mystical music begins to play, adding to the sense of intrigue and wonder. As the trailer progresses, we are introduced to the main characters of the movie - a family who embarks on a summer vacation near the lake. The father, played by Mark Harmon, is a workaholic and somewhat skeptical of the rumored magic in the water, while the two children, Ashley and Joshua, are open-minded and eager to discover the secrets of the lake. The trailer showcases glimpses of the magical beings that inhabit the lake, such as a friendly sea creature and ethereal mermaids.
Xabloyan wrote: Only against those undead specified in the MM i.e. if you raise dead a mummy it turns into a LE 7th level fighter iirc
Again, I realize I may simply work this out with my DM, but it is always nice to have some form of backing to these sort of things, such as a Sage Advice, a Tweet from J. Essentially, a rod is a stick - you could try to make a case that it is similar to a club but clubs generally have weighted ends, albeit not as weighted as a mace.
The trailer showcases glimpses of the magical beings that inhabit the lake, such as a friendly sea creature and ethereal mermaids. It also alludes to the potential dangers faced by the family as they delve deeper into the mysteries of the water. There are brief shots of perilous situations and ominous figures, suggesting a thrilling and suspenseful plot.
Dragonsfoot
I know some, like the rod of lordly might has multiple weapons it can be, or can function as. But what of other rods with potential weapon uses, including rod of resurrection. What sort of weapon proficiency (if used) does it require and what damage does it deal?
And, as a side question, would you let a rod of resurrection work against undead to transform them back into not-dead (alive) state? I've got a fun idea for a part in an upcoming campaign where a mad dwarf cleric smites the undead bringing them to life.
---"You wear a disguise to look like human guys but you're not a man, you're a Chicken Boo." Xabloyan Ancient Deity of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 35381 Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 6:37 pm
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by Xabloyan » Mon Aug 26, 2013 3:04 pm
Only against those undead specified in the MM i.e. if you raise dead a mummy it turns into a LE 7th level fighter iirc
Other than that, it's a jo stick.
dren Greater Associate of the Drakon
Posts: 137 Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 4:58 pm Location: Maine, USA
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by dren » Mon Aug 26, 2013 3:18 pm
I believe, I haven't searched my books, that rods function as footman maces. I could be wrong. Well that's just like your opinion man.PaladinesAngel Greater Deity of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 15791 Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:54 pm Location: Wellington UK
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by PaladinesAngel » Mon Aug 26, 2013 3:27 pm
Smiting is a mace I think.
I would go staff
Astra De Silver 2nd Lvl Human Monk (Initiate)
Orcanus Sunfoot 9th Lvl Halfling Magic-User (Sorcerer)
Tempus Moonstone 4th Lvl Gnome Illusionist (Master Trickster)
"I viewed the illusionist as a very special sort of magic-user, one using magic to simulate magic as it were. Gary Gygax."
predavolk Greater Deity of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 8232 Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 12:53 pm Location: Canada
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by predavolk » Mon Aug 26, 2013 3:35 pm
Doesn't a Raise Dead spell kill most undead? Or is that BECMI or 2E?What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie?
I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky.
The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing;
Rush in and die, dogs-I was a man before I was a king!
Thorkhammer Greater Deity of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 14575 Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:09 am Location: Southern California
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by Thorkhammer » Mon Aug 26, 2013 4:37 pm
Rods are about 3' long and as thick as your thumb. Rods are fashioned from metal, strange wood, ivory or bone. They can be plain or decorated and carved, tipped or not
It goes on to state, "They are fragile and tend to break easily." But that comes at the end of the paragraph, after having described rods, staves and wands. Being that it follows directly after wands, one might conclude that such a statement applies only to wands; others might include the entire group. ymmv
PaladinesAngel Greater Deity of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 15791 Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:54 pm Location: Wellington UK
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by PaladinesAngel » Mon Aug 26, 2013 4:41 pm
predavolk wrote: Doesn't a Raise Dead spell kill most undead? Or is that BECMI or 2E? Quite a few actually are killed outright. Wraiths and such like.Astra De Silver 2nd Lvl Human Monk (Initiate)
Orcanus Sunfoot 9th Lvl Halfling Magic-User (Sorcerer)
Tempus Moonstone 4th Lvl Gnome Illusionist (Master Trickster)
"I viewed the illusionist as a very special sort of magic-user, one using magic to simulate magic as it were. Gary Gygax."
garhkal Titan of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 79349 Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:39 pm Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus ohio Contact:
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by garhkal » Mon Aug 26, 2013 6:03 pm
I'd prob say club. Never seen any source list them being as strong (or large) as maces, flails etc.
As to the undead side. Go by the undead's write up.
chris107 Greater Deity of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 12071 Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 1:06 pm Location: Yorkshire
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by chris107 » Mon Aug 26, 2013 6:09 pm
Horseman's mace unless I hear otherwise.
genghisdon Elder Deity of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 30788 Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:17 am Location: Canuckistan
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by genghisdon » Mon Aug 26, 2013 9:49 pm
jo stick or clubWho watches the watchmen?
"DIE FOR THE DOW"
Black Puddin Lesser Deity of DragonsfootPosts: 3066 Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:52 pm
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by Black Puddin » Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:00 pm
Xabloyan wrote: Only against those undead specified in the MM i.e. if you raise dead a mummy it turns into a LE 7th level fighter iirc
But it specifies Raise Dead, not Resurrection.~People are always selective about the types of "realism" they want in their games.~ Elfdart
~If I wanted role-playing in my role-playing games, I'd join a role-playing game.~ Black Puddin
T. Foster Greater Deity of DragonsfootPosts: 8232 Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 6:06 am
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by T. Foster » Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:04 pm
Jo stick (and FWIW I'd allow clerics and mages to use bo sticks and jo sticks, considering them to fall under the general heading of "staff")
The Mystical Trash Heap - blog about D&D and other 80s pop-culture
The Heroic Legendarium - my book of 1E-compatible rules expansions and modifications, available for sale at DriveThruRPG - now an Electrum best-seller!
Posts: 35381 Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 6:37 pm
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by Xabloyan » Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:57 pm
Black Puddin wrote:Xabloyan wrote: Only against those undead specified in the MM i.e. if you raise dead a mummy it turns into a LE 7th level fighter iirc
But it specifies Raise Dead, not Resurrection. the old name of Resurrection was raise dead fully for a reason.Philotomy Jurament Lesser Deity of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 4501 Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:36 am Location: Texas
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by Philotomy Jurament » Tue Aug 27, 2013 12:43 am
I don't consider rods to be melee weapons to inflict damage, except for rods that are specifically intended for that. I consider them to be relatively thin (thickness of a thumb) for their length and not inherently robust. Note that the DMG says that both wands and rods usually come in a protective case while "staves stand sturdily alone."
If someone uses a metal rod in melee with the goal of inflicting damage (rather than making contact to trigger a magical effect), I'd allow it to act as a club. A wooden or bone rod might act as a half-damage club. Nevertheless, if someone uses a rod that wasn't really intended for melee as a melee weapon to inflict damage, I'd probably ask for item saving throws during the combat.
The problem is not that power corrupts, but that the corruptible are irresistibly drawn to the pursuit of power. Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.
K2h2m3 Personal Avatar of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 1025 Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 6:52 pm Location: Taunton,Ma.
Re: Rod . What Weapon Is It?
Post by K2h2m3 » Tue Aug 27, 2013 4:05 pm
Horseman's mace or light mace depending on edition.PaladinesAngel Greater Deity of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 15791 Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:54 pm Location: Wellington UK
Re: Rod . What Weapon Is It?
Post by PaladinesAngel » Tue Aug 27, 2013 4:10 pm
I always visualised em like modern day walking sticks.Astra De Silver 2nd Lvl Human Monk (Initiate)
Orcanus Sunfoot 9th Lvl Halfling Magic-User (Sorcerer)
Tempus Moonstone 4th Lvl Gnome Illusionist (Master Trickster)
"I viewed the illusionist as a very special sort of magic-user, one using magic to simulate magic as it were. Gary Gygax."
T. Foster Greater Deity of DragonsfootPosts: 8232 Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 6:06 am
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by T. Foster » Tue Aug 27, 2013 5:18 pm
Philotomy Jurament wrote: I don't consider rods to be melee weapons to inflict damage, except for rods that are specifically intended for that. I consider them to be relatively thin (thickness of a thumb) for their length and not inherently robust. Note that the DMG says that both wands and rods usually come in a protective case while "staves stand sturdily alone."
If someone uses a metal rod in melee with the goal of inflicting damage (rather than making contact to trigger a magical effect), I'd allow it to act as a club. A wooden or bone rod might act as a half-damage club. Nevertheless, if someone uses a rod that wasn't really intended for melee as a melee weapon to inflict damage, I'd probably ask for item saving throws during the combat.
On second thought, this is the better answer - even those rods that require physical contact don't do weapon-damage with a hit so there's no need to declare a weapon-equivalent (though I still like the idea of allowing clerics and mages to use bo sticks and jo sticks in addition to quarterstaves).
The Mystical Trash Heap - blog about D&D and other 80s pop-culture
The Heroic Legendarium - my book of 1E-compatible rules expansions and modifications, available for sale at DriveThruRPG - now an Electrum best-seller!
PaladinesAngel Greater Deity of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 15791 Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:54 pm Location: Wellington UK
Re: Rod . What Weapon Is It?
Post by PaladinesAngel » Tue Aug 27, 2013 5:22 pm
The rod of smiting is designed for weapon smashing. And the lordly might.Astra De Silver 2nd Lvl Human Monk (Initiate)
Orcanus Sunfoot 9th Lvl Halfling Magic-User (Sorcerer)
Tempus Moonstone 4th Lvl Gnome Illusionist (Master Trickster)
"I viewed the illusionist as a very special sort of magic-user, one using magic to simulate magic as it were. Gary Gygax."
Xabloyan Ancient Deity of DragonsfootPosts: 35381 Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 6:37 pm
Re: Rod . What Weapon Is It?
Post by Xabloyan » Tue Aug 27, 2013 5:24 pm
The rod of smiting is kinda its own weapon though. I think forcing a cleric to have proficiency with a specific type of weapon like staff, or club, or whatever to use the rod of smiting as a weapon without Np penalty is kind of a ridiculous penalty to enforce.
PaladinesAngel Greater Deity of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 15791 Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:54 pm Location: Wellington UK
Re: Rod . What Weapon Is It?
Post by PaladinesAngel » Tue Aug 27, 2013 5:25 pm
Xabloyan wrote: The rod of smiting is kinda its own weapon though. I think forcing a cleric to have proficiency with a specific type of weapon like staff, or club, or whatever to use the rod of smiting as a weapon without Np penalty is kind of a ridiculous penalty to enforce.
As do iAstra De Silver 2nd Lvl Human Monk (Initiate)
Orcanus Sunfoot 9th Lvl Halfling Magic-User (Sorcerer)
Tempus Moonstone 4th Lvl Gnome Illusionist (Master Trickster)
"I viewed the illusionist as a very special sort of magic-user, one using magic to simulate magic as it were. Gary Gygax."
Bedivere Global ModeratorPosts: 13035 Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:51 am Location: OC, CA
Re: Rod . What Weapon Is It?
Post by Bedivere » Tue Aug 27, 2013 7:38 pm
I'd say jo stick, club, or horseman's mace depending on the rod, and agree that not all rods are made for striking. Not all my rods are 3' long and thick as my thumb, either.
"Let's go back to the abyss where it's safe." - Wylo the Travelergarhkal Titan of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 79349 Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:39 pm Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus ohio Contact:
Re: Rod. What Weapon Is It?
Post by garhkal » Tue Aug 27, 2013 9:47 pm
Xabloyan wrote: Black Puddin wrote:Xabloyan wrote: Only against those undead specified in the MM i.e. if you raise dead a mummy it turns into a LE 7th level fighter iirc
But it specifies Raise Dead, not Resurrection. the old name of Resurrection was raise dead fully for a reason. And many feel if Raise dead can do it, so should resurrection. Confuscious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!Philotomy Jurament Lesser Deity of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 4501 Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:36 am Location: Texas
Re: Rod . What Weapon Is It?
Post by Philotomy Jurament » Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:14 pm
PaladinesAngel wrote: The rod of smiting is designed for weapon smashing. And the lordly might.Just so; those fall into the exception category in my approach (i.e., rods that *are* specifically intended for melee), so I consider them robust enough for melee.
I don't think the rod of smiting should require a proficiency slot. I'd grant automatic proficiency to the wielder as part of the rod's magic.
I'm torn on the the question of proficiency slots for the various weapon forms of the rod of lordly might, mainly because the rod actually changes its form, and because acting as a melee weapon is only one of its functions (unlike the very focused rod of smiting). After some consideration, I think I'll go with this: in its natural, "as is" form, the rod acts as a mace but does not require mace proficiency (similar to my ruling on the rod of smiting). However, when used in its sword, axe, or spear configuration, the appropriate weapon proficiency applies. (Of course, it's a rare Fighter who would possess a rod of lordly might and not be proficient in the sword, spear, and axe.)
Last edited by Philotomy Jurament on Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:15 am, edited 2 times in total.The problem is not that power corrupts, but that the corruptible are irresistibly drawn to the pursuit of power. Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.
garhkal Titan of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 79349 Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:39 pm Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus ohio Contact:
Re: Rod . What Weapon Is It?
Post by garhkal » Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:38 pm
Good rule, though i have seen some who DO require base prof in the mace to use the rod in that form..
Confuscious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!Philotomy Jurament Lesser Deity of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 4501 Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:36 am Location: Texas
Re: Rod . What Weapon Is It?
Post by Philotomy Jurament » Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:59 pm
garhkal wrote: Good rule, though i have seen some who DO require base prof in the mace to use the rod in that form..
Yeah, really DM preference on that one. I wouldn't have a problem with such a ruling.The problem is not that power corrupts, but that the corruptible are irresistibly drawn to the pursuit of power. Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.
garhkal Titan of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 79349 Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:39 pm Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus ohio Contact:
Re: Rod . What Weapon Is It?
Post by garhkal » Wed Aug 28, 2013 4:27 am
Now as a q.. Would someone with weapon specialty in those rods get to use them as if they were the weapon, or by the item write up for strikes?
Confuscious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!paladin2019 Lesser Deity of Dragonsfoot
Posts: 3697 Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 8:32 pm Location: unspecified locations in. Contact:
Intertwined with the magical elements are heartwarming and emotional scenes that explore the family dynamics and personal growth of the characters. The trailer highlights the strong bond between the father and his children, as well as their journey towards believing in the power of magic and the importance of family. Towards the end of the trailer, the intensity heightens as the family faces a pressing threat and must rely on their newfound belief in magic to overcome it. The music swells, enhancing a sense of epic climax and adventure. The trailer concludes with a final shot of the family, now united and confident, standing at the edge of the lake, ready to face whatever challenges lie ahead. The "Magic in the Water" trailer effectively conveys a blend of fantasy, adventure, and emotion. It captures the essence of the movie's themes and leaves viewers intrigued and eager to experience the magical journey themselves..
Reviews for "Venturing into the Unknown: Exploring the Enchanting Elements of the Water Trailer"
1. John - 1 star - I was really disappointed with "Magic in the Water." The trailer made it seem like an exciting adventure, but the movie turned out to be boring and predictable. The acting was subpar, and the plot lacked depth. I found myself checking the time constantly, hoping it would be over soon. I wouldn't recommend this film to anyone looking for a captivating and entertaining experience.
2. Sarah - 2 stars - "Magic in the Water" had the potential to be a good family movie, but it fell short for me. The story lacked originality and felt like a mash-up of cliché elements from other films. The special effects were subpar, making it hard to immerse myself in the supposed magical world. The characters were also underdeveloped, and their motivations seemed forced. Overall, I found the movie to be lackluster and forgettable.
3. Michael - 2 stars - I had high hopes for "Magic in the Water," but unfortunately, it failed to meet my expectations. The pacing was off, with long stretches of boredom between the few exciting moments. The dialogue was cheesy and cringe-worthy, and the performances felt forced and unconvincing. The story had potential, but it ended up being overly simplistic and lacking any real depth. I wouldn't waste my time watching this film again.
4. Emily - 1 star - "Magic in the Water" was a major disappointment. The trailer made it seem like a fun and magical adventure, but the movie turned out to be dull and unengaging. The plot was predictable, and the characters lacked depth. The dialogue was cheesy and lacked any real substance. Overall, I found the film to be a waste of time and would not recommend it to others.