Dispatch Govern My Curse In the world of literature, curses are often used as a source of conflict and tension. They act as a driving force behind the protagonist's actions and decisions. However, curses can also be seen as a means of controlling and manipulating the protagonist's life, thus becoming a governing force that dictates their fate. This idea is reflected in the phrase "Dispatch govern my curse." The term "dispatch" refers to the act of sending someone off or completing a task quickly and efficiently. In the context of curses, it signifies the notion of carrying out the curse's bidding or fulfilling its requirements.
In the context of curses, it signifies the notion of carrying out the curse's bidding or fulfilling its requirements. The word "govern" suggests that the curse holds power over the protagonist, exerting control over their actions and determining their destiny. Curses often come with specific conditions or requirements that must be met for them to be lifted or nullified.
Our first president left us lessons on civility and humility
When George Washington was 6 years old, he received a hatchet as a gift and immediately tested it on his father’s cherry tree. His father saw the damaged tree and asked his son if he had done the deed. The boy confessed with his most famous maxim: “I cannot tell a lie.”
The story itself is a lie, invented by Washington’s 1800 biographer, Mason Locke Weems.
Nevertheless, Washington at age 14 copied in a notebook French maxims from the 16 th century accepted as virtuous during his time. They became known as “110 Rules of Civility.”
To be sure, some of those maxims are hopelessly outdated, such as:
- Spit not in the fire, nor stoop low before it, neither put your hands into the flames to warm them, nor set your feet upon the fire especially if there be meat before it.
But consider these worthy practices:
- Every action done in company ought to be with some sign of respect, to those that are present.
- Show nothing to your friend that may affright him.
- Read no letters, books, or papers in company but when there is a necessity for the doing of it you must ask to leave.
- Reproach none for the infirmities of nature.
- Show not yourself glad at the misfortune of another though he were your enemy.
- When you see a crime punished, you may be inwardly pleased; but always show pity to the suffering offender.
- Do not laugh too loud or too much at any public spectacle.
- Use no reproachful language against anyone, neither curse nor revile.
- Be not hasty to believe flying reports to the disparagement of any.
- Let your conversation be without malice or envy.
- Think before you speak.
- Be not curious to know the affairs of others, neither approach those that speak in private.
- Undertake not what you cannot perform but be careful to keep your promise.
Can you name any current politician or public servant in the White House, Congress or Supreme Court who respects all in their presence; is considerate of others, no matter their station in life; stows away cell phones in public; shows compassion to enemies and offenders; refuses to spread rumors; acts without malice or envy; and keeps their promises?
Those should be qualifications for anyone seeking public office.
Washington may have been civil but also was fallible and, on occasion, immoral. Do you recall the myth about his wooden teeth? After the cherry tree, this is the second most popular misconception about the first president. He did suffer from bad teeth through most of his adult life. But none of those dentures were made of wood; they were fashioned from animal teeth, carved ivory and human teeth from enslaved people.
At the time of his death, Washington owned 123 slaves. Shortly before his death, he freed them and supported others in perpetuity who were too ill to find work.
Washington’s contributions to democracy are many, from his victory over the English at Yorktown in the Revolutionary War to his promises to the American people in his two terms as commander in chief.
Washington set an example for presidents to follow that they should leave office gracefully upon the completion of their terms, a tradition that continued until Donald. J. Trump and the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection.
To understand Washington’s essence, consider his second inaugural address, the shortest in history, at 135 words:
“Fellow Citizens: I am again called upon by the voice of my country to execute the functions of its Chief Magistrate. When the occasion proper for it shall arrive, I shall endeavor to express the high sense I entertain of this distinguished honor, and of the confidence which has been reposed in me by the people of united America.
“Previous to the execution of any official act of the President the Constitution requires an oath of office. This oath I am now about to take, and in your presence: That if it shall be found during my administration of the Government, I have in any instance violated willingly or knowingly the injunctions thereof, I may (besides incurring constitutional punishment) be subject to the upbraidings of all who are now witnesses of the present solemn ceremony.”
He promised to serve with dignity. If he violated his oath, he would duly suffer shame and punishment.
His most important tenet in the “Rules of Civility” is the final one, 110: “Labor to keep alive in your breast that little spark of celestial fire called conscience.”
Washington’s values — trust, respect, courtesy, dignity and honor — all fall under the moral umbrella of humility.
Philosophers define humility as an aspect of the conscience — that still, small voice guiding our actions — based on an inner knowledge of our own goodness and, more importantly, limitations. “Immodest people have, among other things, an inflated sense of themselves, their accomplishments, and their place in the world.”
That would define most politicians and their bombast in advance of the 2022 midterms. The public deserves better.
Those should be qualifications for anyone seeking public office.
These conditions can vary from simple tasks to more complex challenges. In either case, the curse acts as a governing force, compelling the protagonist to comply with its demands. Furthermore, curses can have a profound psychological impact on the protagonist. It is not uncommon for the cursed individual to become fixated on breaking the curse, making it a central focus of their life. This obsession can consume them, leading them to make questionable choices or act against their own best interests. In this way, the curse governs their thoughts and actions, pushing them further into their own predicament. There are numerous examples in literature and folklore where curses play a significant role in shaping the protagonist's fate. These narratives often explore the themes of fate, free will, and the consequences of one's actions. Through the lens of a curse, the protagonist is forced to confront these existential questions and grapple with the idea that their life is being dictated by an external force. In conclusion, the phrase "Dispatch govern my curse" encapsulates the idea that curses can become a governing force in a protagonist's life. They wield power over their actions and decisions, compelling them to carry out the curse's bidding. This notion is often explored in literature, where curses act as a source of conflict and tension, pushing the protagonist to confront their own destiny..
Reviews for "The Curse Whisperer: How Dispatch Transforms Lives"
1. Zoe - 1 star
I found "Dispatch govern my curse" to be a confusing and disjointed read. The story lacked cohesiveness, with multiple plot lines that never seemed to come together. The characters were also poorly developed, making it difficult to connect or care about their fates. The writing style was also confusing, jumping from one perspective to another without clear transitions. Overall, I struggled to follow the story and found it to be a frustrating and unsatisfying read.
2. Max - 2 stars
I had high hopes for "Dispatch govern my curse" based on the reviews I had read, but unfortunately, I was left disappointed. While the concept was intriguing, the execution fell flat. The pacing was uneven, with long stretches of slow, meandering storytelling followed by rushed and unsatisfying climaxes. The dialogue also felt stilted and forced, lacking the natural flow of conversation. Additionally, the prose was overly descriptive at times, making it difficult to stay engaged in the story. Overall, I found "Dispatch govern my curse" to be a mediocre read that didn't live up to its potential.
3. Sarah - 2 stars
I wanted to enjoy "Dispatch govern my curse" as it seemed like an interesting blend of genres, but unfortunately, it didn't live up to my expectations. The main issue I had was with the pacing, which was too slow for my taste. The story seemed to drag on, and I found myself losing interest and struggling to stay engaged. The characters were also somewhat one-dimensional, lacking depth and complexity. While the concept was unique, the execution felt flat, and I ultimately found "Dispatch govern my curse" to be a dull and forgettable read.