The Black Magic Book of Shadows is a highly controversial and mysterious object associated with the occult and dark arts. It is rumored to contain a vast wealth of knowledge and spells related to black magic and witchcraft. This book is said to hold instructions for rituals, incantations, and invocations that supposedly grant power and control over supernatural forces. The origins of the Black Magic Book of Shadows are unclear, with speculation ranging from ancient civilizations to modern practices. Some claim it dates back centuries, while others suggest it is a more recent creation. Regardless of its true age, the book has gained a sort of legendary status within certain circles.
And this pushback wasn’t just from readers. Editors said “Silvia Moreno-Garcia” was too long of a name for a book’s spine, that there was a limit on how many consonants you could put in a character’s name, that the names were simply just too weird, “or people are going to have trouble connecting with that character, which is code for this person is not white,” she says. That fear that anything unfamiliar won’t sell is particularly frustrating when it’s in a gatekeeper. “It’s simply exotic because people haven’t seen anything like it before, right?” she says. “And that’s part of the problem with editors. They think, ‘Well, nobody’s gonna read a book set in Mexico with Mexican characters because it’s just too weird.’ But then they never gave a book set in Mexico with Mexican characters a chance to make it into the market. Part of the role of editing and publishing is taste-making and finding audiences.” As a former marketing professional, Moreno-Garcia would never refuse to market a product simply because it was unfamiliar. “You don’t just say, ‘Well, this microwave. I’ve never seen a microwave before. So, I can’t write any ad copy for it. We’re gonna give up,’” she says. “No ad agency would do that. And sometimes it seems that that is what publishing companies tell you.”
Even more astonishingly, these Generation Z occultists, with their substantial followings on Twitter and TikTok, are about to debate a form of magic that lies at the heart of my research into Shakespeare s England. With the debate about the ethics of Solomonic magic underway on Twitch, I hardly dare imagine Scot s horror, much less King James s, to hear phrases like pro-demon rights from a young person describing themselves as a demonolater and magic is the scientific study of conversations with spiritual beings from a self-professed Solomonic mage.
Regardless of its true age, the book has gained a sort of legendary status within certain circles. Due to the nature of its contents, the Black Magic Book of Shadows has become highly sought after by practitioners of the dark arts. It is said to provide instructions for curses, hexes, and other malevolent spells.
WitchTok: the rise of the occult on social media has eerie parallels with the 16th century
Rebekah King does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Partners
University of Cambridge provides funding as a member of The Conversation UK.
It’s 1.30am in the morning, and I’m about to watch a duel between magicians. One is a “demonolater”, a word I have never heard before, someone who claims they worship demons and can petition them in return for knowledge or power. The other describes themselves as a “Solomonic magician”, and claims to be able to command demons to do his bidding, as some Jewish and Islamic traditions have believed of King Solomon, who ruled Israel in the 10th century BC.
I first discovered this debate because, in the course of studying 16th century books of magic attributed to Solomon, I had found, to my astonishment, that “Solomonic magic” is still alive and well today, and growing in popularity. Twitter had suggested to me that I might be interested in an account called “Solomonic magic”, and a few clicks later I had found myself immersed in a vast online community of young occultists, tweeting and retweeting the latest theories and controversies, and using TikTok to share their craft.
To my further bemusement, it seemed that the tradition of Solomonic magic had recently faced accusations that its strict and authoritative approach to the command of demons amounted to a form of abuse, akin to domestic violence. As I had made a note in my diary of a public debate that I wanted to attend out of sheer curiosity, it seemed astonishing to be asking myself whether Solomonic magic, the same found in books of necromancy dating back hundreds of years, was on the brink of cancellation in 2021.
At 28, I’m slightly too old to be familiar with the platform Twitch, mostly used for live video streaming, but tonight I’ve managed to get it working for this particular debate. As an atheist, I’m very likely in the minority, though I’m not the only Brit to have turned up in spite of it being such an ungodly hour this side of the pond. The chat box is buzzing as occultists of various stripes arrive to hear the arguments.
My mum would hate this, I can’t help thinking to myself. She didn’t even let me read Harry Potter.
When people ask me what I do, it’s always fun to tell them, “I study magic at Cambridge University.” It’s technically true. I’m researching the representation of magic on the early modern stage, and am interested in the ways in which dangerous, forbidden or “occult” knowledge was theorised by Shakespeare and his contemporaries. My research combines my fascination with the mechanisms of belief with my love of storytelling and the stage. When I’m not researching plays, I’m writing them: I’m an award-winning playwright, whose work has been performed across the UK and abroad.
British painter George Romney was only one of many artists whose imagination was inspired by the three witches in Shakespeare’s Macbeth. Wikimedia Commons, CC BY
Suspending disbelief is my forte, but actually believing is something I’ve never been very good at. The history of magic fascinates me because it is a history of people – of human faults and foibles, vanities, hopes and needs – rather than because of any genuine investment in the esoteric. This is why I’m here to listen to articulate and likeable young people across the globe discussing theories of knowledge and the supernatural – beliefs to which I myself cannot subscribe.
Even more astonishingly, these Generation Z occultists, with their substantial followings on Twitter and TikTok, are about to debate a form of magic that lies at the heart of my research into Shakespeare’s England.
This story is part of Conversation Insights
The Insights team generates long-form journalism and is working with academics from different backgrounds who have been engaged in projects to tackle societal and scientific challenges.
As such, it is often associated with individuals who have a desire for power, revenge, or control. However, it is important to note that the use of such practices and the study of black magic is highly controversial and widely debated. Many argue that dabbling in the dark arts can have severe consequences and should be approached with caution, if at all. Some claim that the Black Magic Book of Shadows is nothing more than a myth, a story concocted to sell books or propagate fear. Skeptics question the authenticity and true power of the spells and rituals described within its pages. On the other hand, believers argue that the Black Magic Book of Shadows holds ancient knowledge and secrets that have been passed down through generations. They claim that its use can provide practitioners with a deeper understanding of the hidden forces and energies at play in the universe. Regardless of one's beliefs or opinions, the Black Magic Book of Shadows remains an intriguing and mysterious topic. Its allure and notoriety continue to capture the imagination of those interested in the occult and the supernatural. Whether a relic of ancient times or a modern creation, the book continues to fascinate and mystify those who seek to explore the darker side of human knowledge and experience..
Reviews for "Beyond the Spells: Discovering Other Magical Techniques in the Black Magic Book of Shadows"
1. John - 1/5 stars - I found "Black Magic Book of Shadows" to be extremely disappointing. The book claims to provide in-depth knowledge and spells related to black magic, but I found the content to be shallow and lacking substance. The spells mentioned were generic and not at all impressive. Overall, I feel like the book failed to deliver on its promises and I would not recommend it to anyone seeking genuine knowledge on the subject.
2. Sarah - 2/5 stars - I had high hopes for "Black Magic Book of Shadows" but unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations. The writing style was quite amateurish and it felt like the author didn't have a deep understanding of black magic. Several concepts were confusingly explained and the book lacked proper organization. Additionally, the spells mentioned were either too simplistic or too convoluted to be practically useful. I was left feeling unsatisfied and would suggest looking for better resources on black magic.
3. David - 2/5 stars - As someone who has studied and practiced magic for years, I found "Black Magic Book of Shadows" to be a disappointment. The book lacked depth and substance, providing only surface-level information on black magic. The spells mentioned were unremarkable and lacked any real power. Furthermore, I found the author's tone to be condescending at times, making it difficult to take the book seriously. Overall, I would not recommend this book to serious practitioners of black magic.
4. Emma - 1/5 stars - I regret purchasing "Black Magic Book of Shadows". The book is riddled with typos, grammatical errors, and inconsistencies, which made it difficult to follow. The content often felt repetitive, as if the author was simply trying to fill pages. The spells mentioned lacked clear instructions and didn't seem to have any basis in real witchcraft. I was left feeling frustrated and would advise potential readers to steer clear of this poorly written book.