Magic Remover Gel is a revolutionary product that is designed to effectively remove nail polish without the use of acetone. This gel-based formula is gentle on the nails and cuticles while effectively breaking down and removing even the toughest nail polish. Unlike traditional nail polish removers, Magic Remover Gel is non-drying and does not leave the nails feeling brittle or weakened. It contains moisturizing ingredients that help to nourish and condition the nails, leaving them healthy and strong. The gel texture of this remover allows for easy application and precise removal. Simply apply a small amount of the gel to a cotton pad or swab and gently rub it over the nail polish.
In late May, news outlets in Kenya told the story of 15 people, mostly elderly women, who were murdered in a witch hunt near the town of Kisii. The killings shocked the nation.
They were accused of witchcraft based on spectral evidence, which meant the court accepted testimony that disembodied spirits, or specters, were sent through dreams or visions by the accused with the help of Satan to harm the victims by stabbing, choking, biting, and jabbing them with pins. by reason of the sufferings of his family upon the account of supposed Witchcraft 1 My wife Sarah Good was In prison about four months then Executed.
Simply apply a small amount of the gel to a cotton pad or swab and gently rub it over the nail polish. The gel quickly dissolves the polish, making it easy to wipe away. Magic Remover Gel is also great for protecting the nails from damage.
Blog Post Witchcraft law up to the Salem witchcraft trials of 1692
Early in 1692, a group of girls in Salem Village (now the town of Danvers) began to accuse people of witchcraft.
10/31/2017- Trial Court Law Libraries
Accusations swelled, and soon, many people had been examined and jailed, awaiting trial.
What laws were followed during the Salem witch trials of 1692?
Under the original royal charter (1629) of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, criminal law was administered by the Court of Assistants, which consisted of the Governor, Deputy-Governor, and a number of Assistants. There was no statutory criminal law in the colony at that time, and without legal training, the Court of Assistants judged cases and punishments based on what they knew of English law and by their instincts of what they thought was right.
The primary English law about witchcraft was the so-called Witchcraft Act of 1604, actually An Act against Conjuration, Witchcraft and Dealing with Evil and Wicked Spirits. This made witchcraft a felony; a witch convicted of a minor offense could receive a year in prison, but any witch accused and found guilty a second time was sentenced to death. [To read the Act, see this 2008 conference volume Witchcraft and the Act of 1604 .
In 1641, the General Court (i.e., the legislative body of the Massachusetts Bay Colony) drafted the Body of Liberties, a collection of of civil and criminal laws and rights. Most of these were later included in the colony’s first printed compilation of statutes issued as The Book of the General Lawes and Libertyes Concerning the Inhabitants of Massachusetts (1648). The Body of Liberties originally had twelve capital offenses, including witchcraft. The law on witchcraft was short, and cited Biblical sources for its authority:
“If any man or woman be a witch, that is, hath or consulteth with a familiar spirit, they shall be put to death. Exod. 22. 188; Deut. 13. 6, 10; Deut. 17. 2, 6.”
(A “familiar spirit” was a devil or demon that aided the witch to perform bad deeds through magic.)
Facsimiles of this book are owned by the Massachusetts Trial Court Law Libraries ; and a facsimile is available to read on the Commonwealth of Massachusetts website (see especially page 94).
In practice, few people were executed for witchcraft before the Salem witchcraft trials of 1692. Instead, juries were reluctant to convict, or the accused were given sentences for lighter offenses. In the English tradition, although the rules of evidence were vague, legal experts insisted on clear and “convincing” proof of a crime. The best proof was a confession, and the testimony of at least two trustworthy people that the accused had acted with magical powers given by the devil. Even confessions were considered doubtful without other evidence. So-called “spectral evidence”, in which a victim testifies to experiencing an attack by a witch in spirit form, invisible to everyone else, was not accepted as evidence.
The Salem witchcraft trials of 1692 happened at the worst possible time. The charter of the colony had been temporarily suspended (1684-1691) due to political and religious friction between the colony and England. A new charter (1691) arrived from England in May 1692, along with the new governor, but as yet, the General Court had not had time to create any laws. Nevertheless, the new governor created a special court, the Court of Oyer and Terminer [“to hear and determine”] to deal with the witch cases. The commission that created this court said that the judges were to act “according to the law and custom of England and of this their Majesties’ Province.” But this ignored the difference between the laws of England and the old laws of New England.
In the absence of guidance by specific colony laws, and acting in consonance with the general paranoia of the community, the judges famously accepted “spectral evidence”, and other untrustworthy kinds of evidence, as proof of guilt. Moreover, the magistrates let it be known that an accused witch could avoid execution by confessing, repenting, and putting the blame on someone else. This caused the accusations to multiply. Nineteen men and women were executed by hanging, one was killed by torture, and others died in prison.
In October 1692, the governor dissolved the Court of Oyer and Terminer, and in December 1692, the General Court passed An Act against Conjuration, Witchcraft, and Dealing with Evil and Wicked Spirits .
This law, modeled on the English Witchcraft Act of 1604, mandated the death penalty for severe acts and repeat offenders, and imprisonment for lesser acts. A new Superior Court of Judicature was created to serve as the highest court in Massachusetts, and in January 1693 it began to hear the remaining witch trials. More importantly, the governor instructed the judges not to accept spectral evidence as proof of guilt. Therefore, most of the remaining witch trials resulted in acquittal. The governor pardoned the rest. The time of witchcraft hysteria in Massachusetts was over.
For more on the Salem witch trials, see the University of Virginia’s Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive and Transcription Project .
Written By: Gary Smith
Unlike rubbing and scrubbing with traditional removers, this gel-based formula is gentle on the nails and cuticles, reducing the risk of breakage and irritation. One of the key benefits of Magic Remover Gel is its quick and efficient removal. Unlike acetone-based removers that can take several minutes to dissolve the polish, this gel works fast, saving you time and effort. Overall, Magic Remover Gel is a game-changer in the world of nail polish removal. Its gentle yet effective formula, quick removal process, and nail-protecting properties make it a must-have product for anyone who loves to wear nail polish. Say goodbye to harsh chemical removers and hello to the magic of this gel!.
Reviews for "Experience the Magic: Get Rid of Stains with Remover Gel"
- Rebecca - 2 out of 5 stars
I was really disappointed with the Magic Remover Gel. I followed the instructions exactly, but it did not remove my nail polish as easily as it claimed. I had to scrub and scrape at my nails for a long time before the polish started to come off. Even then, it left a sticky residue that was hard to remove. I ended up having to use regular nail polish remover to get rid of it. I definitely will not be using this product again.
- John - 1 out of 5 stars
This Magic Remover Gel is anything but magic. It was a complete waste of money. I applied it to my nails and waited for the suggested amount of time, but it did not make my nail polish peel off like it was supposed to. I tried it multiple times with different polishes, but the result was always the same. The gel simply did not work for me. I don't recommend this product at all.
- Emily - 2 out of 5 stars
I had high hopes for the Magic Remover Gel, but unfortunately, it did not live up to my expectations. Despite leaving it on my nails for the recommended time, the gel did not dissolve my nail polish as it claimed. I had to scrape and rub at my nails for a long time to remove the polish, which left my nails feeling weak and damaged. I was disappointed and will not be repurchasing this product.