The topic "Curse of Ra upon you" is an intriguing one that delves into ancient Egyptian mythology and the concept of curses. In this particular case, the focus is on the curse associated with the god Ra, which is believed to bring misfortune and calamity upon its recipients. Ra, the sun god in Egyptian mythology, was highly revered and considered a powerful deity. He was believed to control the sun, bringing light, warmth, and life to the world. However, Ra was also capable of great wrath and vengeance when angered or disobeyed. It is this aspect of Ra's character that is attributed to the curse.
It is this aspect of Ra's character that is attributed to the curse. The curse of Ra is said to be inflicted upon those who have committed grave offenses or blasphemy against the god. The exact nature of the curse varies, but common tales speak of unimaginable suffering, plagues, and even death.
The Curse of Canaan
Was Noah wrong for cursing Canaan? Troy Lacey, AiG–U.S., responds.
Dear AiG,
I noticed this tidbit in a recent “feedback”:
While some have thought Ham’s viewing of Noah was sinful, or that Ham did something perverse, the Bible seems to indicate that it was Ham’s mocking response of telling his brothers that was wrong. Rather than respecting his father, Ham apparently took some delight in Noah’s lack of dignity at that moment, and he shared his disrespect with his brothers.
How did you come to the conclusion that Ham mocked his father in Genesis 9:21–25 ? All I see is that Ham saw his father was naked and told his brother. Am I missing something here, a Hebrew definition maybe? Or is it possible that Noah was in the wrong to curse Canaan? He certainly wasn’t perfect, he was just passed out drunk the night before!
Yours in His service,
C.S.
Hi C.S., thank you for contacting Answers in Genesis with your questions. It is highly improbable that Noah was wrong for cursing Canaan, even though he had just awakened from his drunken sleep. Keep in mind that Scripture contains different kinds of curses. The one in view here seems to be a prophetic utterance of malediction upon the descendants of Canaan. This is not an idle or knee-jerk vengeful proclamation, but one of prophetic foresight. Compare this with the curses announced in Deuteronomy 27:12–26 that serve as a warning of what would happen to the Israelites if they disobeyed.
The Bible does not shy away from recording the sins of its key figures, and at times it reveals the motivations behind them. Sometimes men mistakenly do things, and their wrong actions are recorded in Scripture, but when this happens we are often told by the human author of the book (through the Spirit’s guidance) that the person was mistaken or made a bad decision. Thus, in many cases we are not left to wonder ( 2 Kings 4:39–40 and 2 Chronicles 35:20–27 are good examples).
Sometimes we must compare a person’s actions to other biblical teaching to see that it was wrong.
However, sometimes we must compare a person’s actions to other biblical teaching to see that it was wrong. The case in point is a perfect example. The text simply tells us that Noah became drunk, but nothing in the immediate context mentions that he did something wrong. We need to compare his actions to other biblical passages, such as Ephesians 5:18 , to see what the Bible teaches about drunkenness. Regarding Noah’s cursing of Canaan, there is nothing is Scripture to tell us that it was inappropriate.
We also know from Scripture that God is fully capable of predicting the future ( Isaiah 46:10 ). In fact, when a prophecy is from God, we can be certain that it will come to pass, since He can never be wrong ( Isaiah 46:11, 55:11 ). On the other hand, if humans prophesy apart from God’s inspiration, then they will show themselves to be false prophets because their prophecies will fail ( Deuteronomy 18:22 ; Jeremiah 28:9 ).1 Noah’s words did come to pass in the future, as we read that many of Canaan’s descendants were either killed or put under tribute by Israel (descendants of Shem) during the times of Joshua and the Judges, and later by King Solomon.
A possible clue that Ham might be mocking his father is from the Hebrew word used in Genesis 9:22 (the root is ra’ah) which means “to see” but frequently has the connotation of regarding or perceiving. The same word is also used as a noun for birds of prey that use sight to hunt ( Deuteronomy 14:13 ).2 We should remain tentative on this point since we are not told whether or not Ham looked away immediately, but his actions after he saw his father naked are reproachful.
Another strike against Ham is that he observed his father’s nakedness, but his other two brothers deliberately did not. Genesis 9:23–24 states that Shem and Japheth took extra measures to ensure that they did not see their father’s nakedness, and that they covered him. Apparently they didn’t even want to have accidently seen their father naked, but out of respect walked in backwards. If Ham had just accidently observed Noah naked and promptly covered his father (as a good son would have), then there probably would not have been a curse.
Additionally, there was no reason to tell his brothers. That was purely gossip at best, or contempt at worst. Some commentators (Poole, Hodge and Bunyan) have felt that Ham also told his son Canaan, and perhaps that is why Canaan was cursed, because he also came and looked at Noah naked. This is only conjecture, though, since Scripture does not state it. What is stated is that Canaan was cursed, and this must have been due to either the same sin committed by Canaan or a prophetic utterance of the sins that Canaan and his descendants would become notorious for over the coming centuries ( Leviticus 18:3–29 , Deuteronomy 20:17–18 ), or possibly both things.
Think of it this way; if you saw your cousin or a close friend lying passed out, drunk, and naked in your backyard, would you call your siblings over to come take a look? Or out of decency would you at least wrap a blanket around him, and possibly even bring him into the house and put him on the couch? How much more respect should Ham have had for his father?
Why did Noah pronounce a curse upon Canaan rather than Ham? His words came to pass, so we believe he was inspired by God. Other than that, the Bible does not reveal the precise reason why Canaan was cursed instead of Ham. As such, we can only speculate. Here are some of the conjectures I found in my research:
- Noah refused to curse his son since God had already blessed Ham in Genesis 9:1 .
- Noah could see that Canaan also possessed the carnal and materialistic nature of Ham, and he realized it would only get worse in the coming generations. Perhaps this is why the phrase “Ham the father of Canaan” was used in Genesis 9:22 , since Canaan was very much his father’s son.
- Canaan was not only the father of the Canaanites, but also of the Amorites, Jebusites, Sidonians and the Phoenicians. All of these peoples would at some period in the future wage war against the descendants of Shem and (to a lesser extent) Japheth, and would also become grossly idolatrous. Noah may have been prophetically denouncing this departure from faith in the true and living God.
Again, since the Bible does not give us a specific reason, we can only be tentative in our answer to this question. These speculations were provided to give the reader some possible solutions to the problem. Whatever the proper solution, we can be confident that God had a perfectly just reason (or reasons) for inspiring Noah to utter these words.
The inclusion of embarrassing or sinful moments in the lives of key biblical figures testifies to the truthfulness of the biblical accounts. Rather than mythicizing godly men and women, the Bible presents them to us “warts and all.” Noah became drunk. Moses murdered a man. David committed adultery and conspired to murder Uriah. Paul (Saul) persecuted the early church. Yet God used these men in powerful ways. This is a great lesson to all of us. We have all sinned and regularly make mistakes. The God who mightily used Noah, Moses, David, and Paul is the same God Christians believe in and follow. He can use any one of us in a powerful way, despite our failings, if He chooses to do so.
We also know from Scripture that God is fully capable of predicting the future ( Isaiah 46:10 ). In fact, when a prophecy is from God, we can be certain that it will come to pass, since He can never be wrong ( Isaiah 46:11, 55:11 ). On the other hand, if humans prophesy apart from God’s inspiration, then they will show themselves to be false prophets because their prophecies will fail ( Deuteronomy 18:22 ; Jeremiah 28:9 ).1 Noah’s words did come to pass in the future, as we read that many of Canaan’s descendants were either killed or put under tribute by Israel (descendants of Shem) during the times of Joshua and the Judges, and later by King Solomon.
It is believed that the curse is specifically designed to make the recipient's life unbearable as a form of divine retribution. Evidence of the "Curse of Ra upon you" can be found within ancient Egyptian texts, such as the Book of the Dead. These texts often include spells and rituals to invoke the curse as a means of punishing enemies or protecting oneself from harm. The rituals involved offerings, incantations, and prayers to beseech Ra to unleash his wrath on the intended target. Though the curse of Ra may be rooted in mythology and ancient religious beliefs, it continues to capture the imagination of people today. The idea of a powerful deity using their divine powers to enforce justice and punish wrongdoers is a recurring theme in many cultures. Additionally, the curse serves as a cautionary tale, warning individuals against disrespecting or defying the gods. In conclusion, the "Curse of Ra upon you" is a captivating topic that explores the ancient Egyptian concept of divine punishment. Stemming from the character of the powerful god Ra, the curse is believed to bring misfortune and calamity upon those who have committed grave offenses. While it remains rooted in mythology, the curse of Ra continues to fascinate and intrigue people, serving as a reminder of the consequences of disrespecting higher powers..
Reviews for "Ra's Curse: Unexplained Disasters and Misfortunes"
1. Sarah - 1/5 stars - "Curze of ra upun you" was one of the worst books I've ever read. The plot was confusing and all over the place, making it hard to follow along. The characters were poorly developed and lacked any depth or motivation. The writing style was also very mediocre, with stilted dialogue and awkward descriptions. Overall, I found this book extremely disappointing and cannot recommend it to anyone."
2. John - 2/5 stars - "I had high hopes for 'Curze of ra upun you' based on the synopsis, but unfortunately, it did not live up to my expectations. The story was promising, but it felt underdeveloped and rushed. The pacing was uneven, with long stretches of boredom followed by abrupt action sequences. The writing itself was average, with grammatical errors and awkward sentence structure. While I appreciate the effort put into this book, I ultimately found it lacking in substance and cohesion."
3. Jessica - 2/5 stars - "'Curze of ra upun you' was a confusing and convoluted mess. The narrative jumped around without any clear direction, making it difficult to become invested in the story or its characters. The dialogue was stilted and unnatural, often sounding forced and unrealistic. Additionally, the editing was poor, with numerous spelling and grammatical errors throughout the book. Overall, I found this book to be a frustrating and disappointing read."
4. Michael - 1/5 stars - "I regret wasting my time on 'Curze of ra upun you'. The plot was predictable, and the characters lacked any depth or complexity. The writing style was amateurish, with clunky sentences and repetitive descriptions. The book was also littered with grammatical errors and typos, which further hampered my reading experience. I would not recommend this book to anyone looking for a well-crafted and engaging story."
5. Emily - 2/5 stars - "While the concept of 'Curze of ra upun you' sounded intriguing, the execution fell flat. The pacing was inconsistent, with long stretches of slow and uneventful scenes followed by rushed and confusing action sequences. The characters were one-dimensional and lacked any real development. Additionally, the writing style was disjointed, making it difficult to fully immerse myself in the story. Overall, I found this book to be underwhelming and struggled to stay engaged."